Evaluation CRIS 2002


Part 2: Conference Topics:

1.

Did the conference meet your expectations ?


General tendency:

Good (3 and 2)

83 %

Indifferent (1 and -1)

17 %

Bad (-2 and -3)

0 %

To take a look at the comments on the conference topics, please follow this link


2.

Which where your favourite lectures or workshops ?


van Raan, 26 votes (20 %)

Jeffery, 17 votes (14 %)

Zimmerman, 11 votes (9 %)

Tomlin, 10 votes (8 %)

Matthews, 8 votes (6 %)

Staab, 6 votes (5 %)

Krause, 6 votes (5 %)

Mons, 6 votes (5 %)

Hauge, 5 votes (4 %)

Lepori, 4 votes (3 %)

Sander-Beuermann, 4 votes (3 %)

Andricik, 3 votes (2 %)

Bartolo, 3 votes (2 %)

Lopatenko, 3 votes (2 %)

Salm, 3 votes (2 %)

Andricik, 3 votes (2 %)

Lalieu, 3 votes (2 %)

Ryssevik, 2 votes (2 %)

Strötgen, 2 vote (2 %)

Asserson, 1 vote (1 %)

Birkenmeier, 1 vote (1 %)

Hellweg, 1 vote (1 %)

Vindvad, 1 vote (1 %)


3.

Which where your favourite posters ?


Simons, 11 votes (21%)

Holzer, 10 votes (19 %)

Esch, 8 votes (16 %)

Zimmermann, 6 votes (12%)

Gaslikova, 5 vote (10%)

Lopatenko, 3 votes (5%)

Springer, 3 votes (5%)

Muuli, 2 votes (3%)

Bux, 2 vote (3%)

Tiirik, 1 vote (2%)

 © CRIS2002

 
  University of Kassel Social Science Information Centre, Bonn, Germany euroCRIS - Current Research Information Systems