Organising Vulnerable Workers – Comparisons between India, South Africa and Ghana

To identify and analyse the organisational forms, strategies and sources of power that are emerging amongst vulnerable workers in India, Ghana and South Africa

Organising Vulnerable work, or what is referred to as precarious work, is the biggest challenge facing the global labour movement today. Until recently, these workers were dismissed as unorganisable. They were seen as atomized, geographically dispersed and unable to pay dues raising tremendous collective action problems. Increasingly they are being organized – street vendors, domestic workers, home-based producers, waste pickers and other low income workers are being mobilised. In large part, they are rejecting traditional trade union and forming new types of organisations that bring workers together to promote their rights and interests. In the USA, we see the emergence of worker centres. In South Africa, casual worker advice officers, in India, informal workers use the democratic electoral competition amongst different parties to promote their demands and Ghana has a long-standing trade union presence in the informal economy. The question we are trying to answer in this research cluster is: how do these workers organize, what form does it take, what strategies do they use, what sources of power do they draw on, what are their relationships with traditional unions and how are traditional unions responding. In order to capture these experiences effectively, we are partnering with progressive trade union movements in the three countries – in SA, it is the Cosatu task team on Organising Vulnerable workers, in Ghana, it’s the informal desk of the Ghanaian Trade union Congress and in India, the Self Employed Workers Association (SEWA) and NGOs such as LEARN.

1. To identify and analyse the organisational forms, strategies and sources of power that are emerging amongst vulnerable workers in India, Ghana and South Africa
   
   
2. To indentify ways in which the voice of vulnerable workers and their working conditions can be improved.

Download Report <media 5583>here</media>

• Webster, E. ;Joynt, K.; Metcalfe (2013). A. Repositioning Peak-level social dialogue in South Africa; Nedlac into the future, Johannesburg: National economic Development and Labour Council.

Prof. Sharit Bhowmik

E-Mail: <link mail>sharitb(at)tiss.edu

Prof. Edward Webster
E-Mail:<link mail>Edward.Webster(at)wits.ac.za
<link https: www.wits.ac.za staff academic-a-z-listing w edwardwebsterwitsacza>Website<link http: www.wits.ac.za humanities swop>

Dr. Akua Britwum
E-Mail: <link mail>akupokua(at)gmail.com