Publications

[ 2023 ]
[ 2022 ]
[ 2021 ]
[ 2020 ]
[ 2019 ]
[ 2018 ]
[ 2017 ]
[ 2016 ]

2023[ to top ]

Hirth, J., Horn, V., Stumme, G., & Hanika, T. (2023). Ordinal Motifs in Lattices. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.04827
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
Lattices are a commonly used structure for the representation and analysis of relational and ontological knowledge. In particular, the analysis of these requires a decomposition of a large and high-dimensional lattice into a set of understandably large parts. With the present work we propose /ordinal motifs/ as analytical units of meaning. We study these ordinal substructures (or standard scales) through (full) scale-measures of formal contexts from the field of formal concept analysis. We show that the underlying decision problems are NP-complete and provide results on how one can incrementally identify ordinal motifs to save computational effort. Accompanying our theoretical results, we demonstrate how ordinal motifs can be leveraged to retrieve basic meaning from a medium sized ordinal data set.
@misc{hirth2023ordinal, abstract = {Lattices are a commonly used structure for the representation and analysis of relational and ontological knowledge. In particular, the analysis of these requires a decomposition of a large and high-dimensional lattice into a set of understandably large parts. With the present work we propose /ordinal motifs/ as analytical units of meaning. We study these ordinal substructures (or standard scales) through (full) scale-measures of formal contexts from the field of formal concept analysis. We show that the underlying decision problems are NP-complete and provide results on how one can incrementally identify ordinal motifs to save computational effort. Accompanying our theoretical results, we demonstrate how ordinal motifs can be leveraged to retrieve basic meaning from a medium sized ordinal data set.}, author = {Hirth, Johannes and Horn, Viktoria and Stumme, Gerd and Hanika, Tom}, keywords = {itegpub}, title = {Ordinal Motifs in Lattices}, year = 2023 }
%0 Generic %1 hirth2023ordinal %A Hirth, Johannes %A Horn, Viktoria %A Stumme, Gerd %A Hanika, Tom %D 2023 %R 10.48550/arXiv.2304.04827 %T Ordinal Motifs in Lattices %X Lattices are a commonly used structure for the representation and analysis of relational and ontological knowledge. In particular, the analysis of these requires a decomposition of a large and high-dimensional lattice into a set of understandably large parts. With the present work we propose /ordinal motifs/ as analytical units of meaning. We study these ordinal substructures (or standard scales) through (full) scale-measures of formal contexts from the field of formal concept analysis. We show that the underlying decision problems are NP-complete and provide results on how one can incrementally identify ordinal motifs to save computational effort. Accompanying our theoretical results, we demonstrate how ordinal motifs can be leveraged to retrieve basic meaning from a medium sized ordinal data set.
Hirth, J., Horn, V., Stumme, G., & Hanika, T. (2023). Automatic Textual Explanations of Concept Lattices. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.08093
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
Lattices and their order diagrams are an essential tool for communicating knowledge and insights about data. This is in particular true when applying Formal Concept Analysis. Such representations, however, are difficult to comprehend by untrained users and in general in cases where lattices are large. We tackle this problem by automatically generating textual explanations for lattices using standard scales. Our method is based on the general notion of ordinal motifs in lattices for the special case of standard scales. We show the computational complexity of identifying a small number of standard scales that cover most of the lattice structure. For these, we provide textual explanation templates, which can be applied to any occurrence of a scale in any data domain. These templates are derived using principles from human-computer interaction and allow for a comprehensive textual explanation of lattices. We demonstrate our approach on the spices planner data set, which is a medium sized formal context comprised of fifty-six meals (objects) and thirty-seven spices (attributes). The resulting 531 formal concepts can be covered by means of about 100 standard scales.
@misc{hirth2023automatic, abstract = {Lattices and their order diagrams are an essential tool for communicating knowledge and insights about data. This is in particular true when applying Formal Concept Analysis. Such representations, however, are difficult to comprehend by untrained users and in general in cases where lattices are large. We tackle this problem by automatically generating textual explanations for lattices using standard scales. Our method is based on the general notion of ordinal motifs in lattices for the special case of standard scales. We show the computational complexity of identifying a small number of standard scales that cover most of the lattice structure. For these, we provide textual explanation templates, which can be applied to any occurrence of a scale in any data domain. These templates are derived using principles from human-computer interaction and allow for a comprehensive textual explanation of lattices. We demonstrate our approach on the spices planner data set, which is a medium sized formal context comprised of fifty-six meals (objects) and thirty-seven spices (attributes). The resulting 531 formal concepts can be covered by means of about 100 standard scales.}, author = {Hirth, Johannes and Horn, Viktoria and Stumme, Gerd and Hanika, Tom}, keywords = {itegpub}, title = {Automatic Textual Explanations of Concept Lattices}, year = 2023 }
%0 Generic %1 hirth2023automatic %A Hirth, Johannes %A Horn, Viktoria %A Stumme, Gerd %A Hanika, Tom %D 2023 %R 10.48550/arXiv.2304.08093 %T Automatic Textual Explanations of Concept Lattices %X Lattices and their order diagrams are an essential tool for communicating knowledge and insights about data. This is in particular true when applying Formal Concept Analysis. Such representations, however, are difficult to comprehend by untrained users and in general in cases where lattices are large. We tackle this problem by automatically generating textual explanations for lattices using standard scales. Our method is based on the general notion of ordinal motifs in lattices for the special case of standard scales. We show the computational complexity of identifying a small number of standard scales that cover most of the lattice structure. For these, we provide textual explanation templates, which can be applied to any occurrence of a scale in any data domain. These templates are derived using principles from human-computer interaction and allow for a comprehensive textual explanation of lattices. We demonstrate our approach on the spices planner data set, which is a medium sized formal context comprised of fifty-six meals (objects) and thirty-seven spices (attributes). The resulting 531 formal concepts can be covered by means of about 100 standard scales.
Horn, V., & Draude, C. (2023). Policy design in data economy: In need for a public online news (eco)system?. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.10911
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
Socio-technical design embeds social investigations and inquiries into (Information) Technology Design processes. In this position paper, we propose, by using the aforementioned approach the design of technology and policies can simultaneously inform each other. Additionally we present data economy and particularly anchored online journalism platforms as use cases of policy need and design potentials.
@misc{horn2023policy, abstract = {Socio-technical design embeds social investigations and inquiries into (Information) Technology Design processes. In this position paper, we propose, by using the aforementioned approach the design of technology and policies can simultaneously inform each other. Additionally we present data economy and particularly anchored online journalism platforms as use cases of policy need and design potentials.}, author = {Horn, Viktoria and Draude, Claude}, keywords = {itegpub}, title = {Policy design in data economy: In need for a public online news (eco)system?}, year = 2023 }
%0 Generic %1 horn2023policy %A Horn, Viktoria %A Draude, Claude %D 2023 %R 10.48550/arXiv.2304.10911 %T Policy design in data economy: In need for a public online news (eco)system? %X Socio-technical design embeds social investigations and inquiries into (Information) Technology Design processes. In this position paper, we propose, by using the aforementioned approach the design of technology and policies can simultaneously inform each other. Additionally we present data economy and particularly anchored online journalism platforms as use cases of policy need and design potentials.
Klumbytė, G., Piehl, H., & Draude, C. (2023). Towards Feminist Intersectional XAI: From Explainability to Response-Ability. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.03375
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
This paper follows calls for critical approaches to computing and conceptualisations of intersectional, feminist, decolonial HCI and AI design and asks what a feminist intersectional perspective in HCXAI research and design might look like. Sketching out initial research directions and implications for explainable AI design, it suggests that explainability from a feminist perspective would include the fostering of response-ability - the capacity to critically evaluate and respond to AI systems - and would centre marginalised perspectives.
@misc{klumbyte2023towards, abstract = {This paper follows calls for critical approaches to computing and conceptualisations of intersectional, feminist, decolonial HCI and AI design and asks what a feminist intersectional perspective in HCXAI research and design might look like. Sketching out initial research directions and implications for explainable AI design, it suggests that explainability from a feminist perspective would include the fostering of response-ability - the capacity to critically evaluate and respond to AI systems - and would centre marginalised perspectives.}, author = {Klumbytė, Goda and Piehl, Hannah and Draude, Claude}, keywords = {itegpub}, note = {Workshop Human-Centered Explainable AI (HCXAI), ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 23, April 23-28, 2023, Hamburg, Germany}, title = {Towards Feminist Intersectional XAI: From Explainability to Response-Ability}, year = 2023 }
%0 Generic %1 klumbyte2023towards %A Klumbytė, Goda %A Piehl, Hannah %A Draude, Claude %D 2023 %R 10.48550/arXiv.2305.03375 %T Towards Feminist Intersectional XAI: From Explainability to Response-Ability %X This paper follows calls for critical approaches to computing and conceptualisations of intersectional, feminist, decolonial HCI and AI design and asks what a feminist intersectional perspective in HCXAI research and design might look like. Sketching out initial research directions and implications for explainable AI design, it suggests that explainability from a feminist perspective would include the fostering of response-ability - the capacity to critically evaluate and respond to AI systems - and would centre marginalised perspectives.
Klumbytė, G., Piehl, H., & Draude, C. (2023). Explaining the ghosts: Feminist intersectional XAI and cartography as methods to account for invisible labour. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.03376
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
Contemporary automation through AI entails a substantial amount of behind-the-scenes human labour, which is often both invisibilised and underpaid. Since invisible labour, including labelling and maintenance work, is an integral part of contemporary AI systems, it remains important to sensitise users to its role. We suggest that this could be done through explainable AI (XAI) design, particularly feminist intersectional XAI. We propose the method of cartography, which stems from feminist intersectional research, to draw out a systemic perspective of AI and include dimensions of AI that pertain to invisible labour.
@misc{klumbyte2023explaining, abstract = {Contemporary automation through AI entails a substantial amount of behind-the-scenes human labour, which is often both invisibilised and underpaid. Since invisible labour, including labelling and maintenance work, is an integral part of contemporary AI systems, it remains important to sensitise users to its role. We suggest that this could be done through explainable AI (XAI) design, particularly feminist intersectional XAI. We propose the method of cartography, which stems from feminist intersectional research, to draw out a systemic perspective of AI and include dimensions of AI that pertain to invisible labour.}, author = {Klumbytė, Goda and Piehl, Hannah and Draude, Claude}, keywords = {itegpub}, note = {Workshop Behind the Scenes of Automation: Ghostly Care-Work, Maintenance, and Interference, ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 23, April 23-28, 2023, Hamburg, Germany}, title = {Explaining the ghosts: Feminist intersectional XAI and cartography as methods to account for invisible labour}, year = 2023 }
%0 Generic %1 klumbyte2023explaining %A Klumbytė, Goda %A Piehl, Hannah %A Draude, Claude %D 2023 %R 10.48550/arXiv.2305.03376 %T Explaining the ghosts: Feminist intersectional XAI and cartography as methods to account for invisible labour %X Contemporary automation through AI entails a substantial amount of behind-the-scenes human labour, which is often both invisibilised and underpaid. Since invisible labour, including labelling and maintenance work, is an integral part of contemporary AI systems, it remains important to sensitise users to its role. We suggest that this could be done through explainable AI (XAI) design, particularly feminist intersectional XAI. We propose the method of cartography, which stems from feminist intersectional research, to draw out a systemic perspective of AI and include dimensions of AI that pertain to invisible labour.
Ohde, F., Blättel-Mink, B., Draude, C., & Spiecker gen. Döhmann, I. (2023). Geschlechtergerechtigkeit im Spannungsfeld von nachhaltiger und digitaler Transformation – eine interdisziplinäre Annäherung. GENDER – Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur Und Gesellschaft, 15(2), 132-147. https://doi.org/10.3224/gender.v15i2.10
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
Die Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) der Vereinten Nationen streben anhand von SDG 5 danach, die Gleichheit der Geschlechter im globalen Kontext herzustellen. Wir zeigen, dass der aktuelle, global angelegte Nachhaltigkeitsdiskurs nicht nur blinde Flecken im Hinblick auf die konsequente Bekämpfung geschlechtsspezifischer Ungleichheiten aufweist, sondern auch einen wenig reflektierten Umgang mit der digitalen Transformation pflegt. Mögliche Ansätze zur Bewältigung des identifizierten Spannungsfeldes sehen wir in einer gendersensiblen IT-Gestaltung, einem digitalen Gleichstellungsgesetz und der konsequenten Bewertung von Folgen der globalen Nachhaltigkeitspolitik und -forschung im Hinblick auf Diskriminierung.
@article{Ohde_2023, abstract = {Die Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) der Vereinten Nationen streben anhand von SDG 5 danach, die Gleichheit der Geschlechter im globalen Kontext herzustellen. Wir zeigen, dass der aktuelle, global angelegte Nachhaltigkeitsdiskurs nicht nur blinde Flecken im Hinblick auf die konsequente Bekämpfung geschlechtsspezifischer Ungleichheiten aufweist, sondern auch einen wenig reflektierten Umgang mit der digitalen Transformation pflegt. Mögliche Ansätze zur Bewältigung des identifizierten Spannungsfeldes sehen wir in einer gendersensiblen IT-Gestaltung, einem digitalen Gleichstellungsgesetz und der konsequenten Bewertung von Folgen der globalen Nachhaltigkeitspolitik und -forschung im Hinblick auf Diskriminierung.}, author = {Ohde, Franziska and Blättel-Mink, Birgit and Draude, Claude and Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Indra}, journal = {GENDER – Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft}, keywords = {itegpub}, month = {jun}, number = 2, pages = {132-147}, publisher = {Verlag Barbara Budrich}, title = {Geschlechtergerechtigkeit im Spannungsfeld von nachhaltiger und digitaler Transformation – eine interdisziplinäre Annäherung}, volume = 15, year = 2023 }
%0 Journal Article %1 Ohde_2023 %A Ohde, Franziska %A Blättel-Mink, Birgit %A Draude, Claude %A Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Indra %D 2023 %I Verlag Barbara Budrich %J GENDER – Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft %N 2 %P 132-147 %R 10.3224/gender.v15i2.10 %T Geschlechtergerechtigkeit im Spannungsfeld von nachhaltiger und digitaler Transformation – eine interdisziplinäre Annäherung %V 15 %X Die Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) der Vereinten Nationen streben anhand von SDG 5 danach, die Gleichheit der Geschlechter im globalen Kontext herzustellen. Wir zeigen, dass der aktuelle, global angelegte Nachhaltigkeitsdiskurs nicht nur blinde Flecken im Hinblick auf die konsequente Bekämpfung geschlechtsspezifischer Ungleichheiten aufweist, sondern auch einen wenig reflektierten Umgang mit der digitalen Transformation pflegt. Mögliche Ansätze zur Bewältigung des identifizierten Spannungsfeldes sehen wir in einer gendersensiblen IT-Gestaltung, einem digitalen Gleichstellungsgesetz und der konsequenten Bewertung von Folgen der globalen Nachhaltigkeitspolitik und -forschung im Hinblick auf Diskriminierung.
Richter, C., & Draude, C. (2023). Erfahrungswissen in der Pflege – Chancen partizipativer Aktionsforschung und diskriminierungssensibler Technikentwicklung. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-023-00672-x
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
@article{Richter_2023, author = {Richter, Caroline and Draude, Claude}, journal = {Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO)}, keywords = {itegpub}, month = {apr}, publisher = {Springer}, title = {Erfahrungswissen in der Pflege – Chancen partizipativer Aktionsforschung und diskriminierungssensibler Technikentwicklung}, year = 2023 }
%0 Journal Article %1 Richter_2023 %A Richter, Caroline %A Draude, Claude %D 2023 %I Springer %J Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO) %R 10.1007/s11612-023-00672-x %T Erfahrungswissen in der Pflege – Chancen partizipativer Aktionsforschung und diskriminierungssensibler Technikentwicklung
Smith, J., Klumbytė, G., & Britton, R. L. (2023). From ‘if-then’ to ‘what if?’ Rethinking healthcare algorithmics with posthuman speculative ethics. Nursing Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12447
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
This article discusses the role that algorithmic thinking and management play in health care and the kind of exclusions this might create. We argue that evidence-based medicine relies on research and data to create pathways for patient journeys. Coupled with data-based algorithmic prediction tools in health care, they establish what could be called health care algorithmics—a mode of management of healthcare that produces forms of algorithmic governmentality. Relying on a critical posthumanist perspective, we show how healthcare algorithmics is contingent on the way authority over bodies is produced and how predictive health care algorithms can reproduce inequalities of the worlds from which they are made, centreing possible futures on existing normativities regulated through algorithmic biopower. In contrast to that, we explore posthuman speculative ethics as a way to challenge understanding of ‘ethics’ and ‘care’ in healthcare algorithmics. We suggest some possible avenues towards working speculative ethics into health care while still being critically attentive to algorithmic modes of management and prediction in health care.
@article{https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12447, abstract = {This article discusses the role that algorithmic thinking and management play in health care and the kind of exclusions this might create. We argue that evidence-based medicine relies on research and data to create pathways for patient journeys. Coupled with data-based algorithmic prediction tools in health care, they establish what could be called health care algorithmics—a mode of management of healthcare that produces forms of algorithmic governmentality. Relying on a critical posthumanist perspective, we show how healthcare algorithmics is contingent on the way authority over bodies is produced and how predictive health care algorithms can reproduce inequalities of the worlds from which they are made, centreing possible futures on existing normativities regulated through algorithmic biopower. In contrast to that, we explore posthuman speculative ethics as a way to challenge understanding of ‘ethics’ and ‘care’ in healthcare algorithmics. We suggest some possible avenues towards working speculative ethics into health care while still being critically attentive to algorithmic modes of management and prediction in health care.}, author = {Smith, Jamie and Klumbytė, Goda and Britton, Ren Loren}, journal = {Nursing Philosophy}, keywords = {speculative_ethics}, title = {From ‘if-then’ to ‘what if?’ Rethinking healthcare algorithmics with posthuman speculative ethics}, year = 2023 }
%0 Journal Article %1 https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12447 %A Smith, Jamie %A Klumbytė, Goda %A Britton, Ren Loren %D 2023 %J Nursing Philosophy %R 10.1111/nup.12447 %T From ‘if-then’ to ‘what if?’ Rethinking healthcare algorithmics with posthuman speculative ethics %U https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/nup.12447 %X This article discusses the role that algorithmic thinking and management play in health care and the kind of exclusions this might create. We argue that evidence-based medicine relies on research and data to create pathways for patient journeys. Coupled with data-based algorithmic prediction tools in health care, they establish what could be called health care algorithmics—a mode of management of healthcare that produces forms of algorithmic governmentality. Relying on a critical posthumanist perspective, we show how healthcare algorithmics is contingent on the way authority over bodies is produced and how predictive health care algorithms can reproduce inequalities of the worlds from which they are made, centreing possible futures on existing normativities regulated through algorithmic biopower. In contrast to that, we explore posthuman speculative ethics as a way to challenge understanding of ‘ethics’ and ‘care’ in healthcare algorithmics. We suggest some possible avenues towards working speculative ethics into health care while still being critically attentive to algorithmic modes of management and prediction in health care.
Smith, J. B., Klumbytė, G., Sidebottom, K., Dillard-Wright, J., Willis, E., Brown, B. B., & Hopkins-Walsh, J. (2023). We all care, ALL the time. Nursing Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12572
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
@article{Smith_2023, author = {Smith, Jamie B. and Klumbytė, Goda and Sidebottom, Kay and Dillard-Wright, Jess and Willis, Eva and Brown, Brandon B. and Hopkins-Walsh, Jane}, journal = {Nursing Inquiry}, keywords = {itegpub}, month = {jun}, publisher = {Wiley}, title = {We all care, ALL the time}, year = 2023 }
%0 Journal Article %1 Smith_2023 %A Smith, Jamie B. %A Klumbytė, Goda %A Sidebottom, Kay %A Dillard-Wright, Jess %A Willis, Eva %A Brown, Brandon B. %A Hopkins-Walsh, Jane %D 2023 %I Wiley %J Nursing Inquiry %R 10.1111/nin.12572 %T We all care, ALL the time %U https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fnin.12572

2022[ to top ]

Athanasiadou, L., Klumbytė, G., & Rouvroy, A. (2022). Re-Imagining a ’We’ Beyond the Gathering of Reductions. Propositions for the Three Ecologies. FOOTPRINT, 16(1), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.7480/footprint.16.1.5933
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
In this article Lila Athanasiadou and Goda Klumbytė engage in a conversation with Antoinette Rouvroy to revisit Guattari’s "Three Ecologies" and discuss their dynamics in and for the digital age. While a lot of the discourses on algorithms and digital future invoke catastrophic imaginaries of totalizing control, this conversation works with a propositional format, teasing out affirmative politics by pointing to spaces of potentiality within the environmental, the social and the mental realm. Starting from the environmental ecology and thinking of data as a waste, Rouvroy discusses planetary exhaustion as the result of the depletion of natural resources, forced labour practices and the assumption that data hold the answers to the problems posed by global capital. Proposing a space for material experimentation, she speculates on the potential of emerging subjectivities that remain irreducible to data flows. Within social ecology, Rouvroy advocates for the urgency to center digital policy as the space in which the new forms of institutions emerge in order to reorient the power of computation towards the commons. Lastly, within the mental ecology, Rouvroy reconceptualizes the legal subject as a performance that operates within the proliferation of asignifying data signs, reimagining a “we” beyond the gathering of reductions.
@article{athanasiadou2022reimagining, abstract = {In this article Lila Athanasiadou and Goda Klumbytė engage in a conversation with Antoinette Rouvroy to revisit Guattari’s "Three Ecologies" and discuss their dynamics in and for the digital age. While a lot of the discourses on algorithms and digital future invoke catastrophic imaginaries of totalizing control, this conversation works with a propositional format, teasing out affirmative politics by pointing to spaces of potentiality within the environmental, the social and the mental realm. Starting from the environmental ecology and thinking of data as a waste, Rouvroy discusses planetary exhaustion as the result of the depletion of natural resources, forced labour practices and the assumption that data hold the answers to the problems posed by global capital. Proposing a space for material experimentation, she speculates on the potential of emerging subjectivities that remain irreducible to data flows. Within social ecology, Rouvroy advocates for the urgency to center digital policy as the space in which the new forms of institutions emerge in order to reorient the power of computation towards the commons. Lastly, within the mental ecology, Rouvroy reconceptualizes the legal subject as a performance that operates within the proliferation of asignifying data signs, reimagining a “we” beyond the gathering of reductions.}, author = {Athanasiadou, Lila and Klumbytė, Goda and Rouvroy, Antoinette}, booktitle = {The Epiphylogenetic Turn and Architecture: In (Tertiary) Memory of Bernard Stiegler}, journal = {FOOTPRINT}, keywords = {itegpub}, month = {jul}, number = 1, pages = {121-134}, title = {Re-Imagining a 'We' Beyond the Gathering of Reductions. Propositions for the Three Ecologies}, volume = 16, year = 2022 }
%0 Journal Article %1 athanasiadou2022reimagining %A Athanasiadou, Lila %A Klumbytė, Goda %A Rouvroy, Antoinette %B The Epiphylogenetic Turn and Architecture: In (Tertiary) Memory of Bernard Stiegler %D 2022 %J FOOTPRINT %N 1 %P 121-134 %R 10.7480/footprint.16.1.5933 %T Re-Imagining a 'We' Beyond the Gathering of Reductions. Propositions for the Three Ecologies %U https://doi.org/10.7480/footprint.16.1.5933 %V 16 %X In this article Lila Athanasiadou and Goda Klumbytė engage in a conversation with Antoinette Rouvroy to revisit Guattari’s "Three Ecologies" and discuss their dynamics in and for the digital age. While a lot of the discourses on algorithms and digital future invoke catastrophic imaginaries of totalizing control, this conversation works with a propositional format, teasing out affirmative politics by pointing to spaces of potentiality within the environmental, the social and the mental realm. Starting from the environmental ecology and thinking of data as a waste, Rouvroy discusses planetary exhaustion as the result of the depletion of natural resources, forced labour practices and the assumption that data hold the answers to the problems posed by global capital. Proposing a space for material experimentation, she speculates on the potential of emerging subjectivities that remain irreducible to data flows. Within social ecology, Rouvroy advocates for the urgency to center digital policy as the space in which the new forms of institutions emerge in order to reorient the power of computation towards the commons. Lastly, within the mental ecology, Rouvroy reconceptualizes the legal subject as a performance that operates within the proliferation of asignifying data signs, reimagining a “we” beyond the gathering of reductions.
Braidotti, R., Jones, E., & Klumbytė, G. (2022). Convergences. In R. Braidotti, E. Jones, & G. Klumbytė (Eds.), More Posthuman Glossary (pp. 21-22). Bloomsbury Publishing.
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
@incollection{braidotti2022convergences, author = {Braidotti, Rosi and Jones, Emily and Klumbytė, Goda}, booktitle = {More Posthuman Glossary}, editor = {Braidotti, Rosi and Jones, Emily and Klumbytė, Goda}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {21-22}, publisher = {Bloomsbury Publishing}, title = {Convergences}, year = 2022 }
%0 Book Section %1 braidotti2022convergences %A Braidotti, Rosi %A Jones, Emily %A Klumbytė, Goda %B More Posthuman Glossary %D 2022 %E Braidotti, Rosi %E Jones, Emily %E Klumbytė, Goda %I Bloomsbury Publishing %P 21-22 %T Convergences
More Posthuman Glossary. (2022). In R. Braidotti, E. Jones, & G. Klumbytė (Eds.), Theory in the New Humanities (First). Bloomsbury Publishing.
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
The notion of the posthuman continues to both intrigue and confuse, not least because of the huge number of ideas, theories and figures associated with this term. More Posthuman Glossary provides a way in to the dizzying array of posthuman concepts, providing vivid accounts of emerging terms. It is much more than a series of definitions, however, in that it seeks to imagine and predict what new terms might come into being as this exciting field continues to expand. A follow-up volume to the brilliant interventions of Posthuman Glossary (2018), this book extends and elaborates on that work, particularly focusing on concepts of race, indigeneity and new ideas in radical ecology. It also includes new and emerging voices within the new humanities and multiple modes of communicating ideas. This is an indispensible glossary for those who are exploring what the non-human, inhuman and posthuman might mean in the 21st century.
@book{braidotti2022posthuman, abstract = {The notion of the posthuman continues to both intrigue and confuse, not least because of the huge number of ideas, theories and figures associated with this term. More Posthuman Glossary provides a way in to the dizzying array of posthuman concepts, providing vivid accounts of emerging terms. It is much more than a series of definitions, however, in that it seeks to imagine and predict what new terms might come into being as this exciting field continues to expand. A follow-up volume to the brilliant interventions of Posthuman Glossary (2018), this book extends and elaborates on that work, particularly focusing on concepts of race, indigeneity and new ideas in radical ecology. It also includes new and emerging voices within the new humanities and multiple modes of communicating ideas. This is an indispensible glossary for those who are exploring what the non-human, inhuman and posthuman might mean in the 21st century.}, edition = {First}, editor = {Braidotti, Rosi and Jones, Emily and Klumbytė, Goda}, keywords = {itegpub}, publisher = {Bloomsbury Publishing}, series = {Theory in the New Humanities}, title = {More Posthuman Glossary}, year = 2022 }
%0 Book %1 braidotti2022posthuman %B Theory in the New Humanities %D 2022 %E Braidotti, Rosi %E Jones, Emily %E Klumbytė, Goda %I Bloomsbury Publishing %T More Posthuman Glossary %X The notion of the posthuman continues to both intrigue and confuse, not least because of the huge number of ideas, theories and figures associated with this term. More Posthuman Glossary provides a way in to the dizzying array of posthuman concepts, providing vivid accounts of emerging terms. It is much more than a series of definitions, however, in that it seeks to imagine and predict what new terms might come into being as this exciting field continues to expand. A follow-up volume to the brilliant interventions of Posthuman Glossary (2018), this book extends and elaborates on that work, particularly focusing on concepts of race, indigeneity and new ideas in radical ecology. It also includes new and emerging voices within the new humanities and multiple modes of communicating ideas. This is an indispensible glossary for those who are exploring what the non-human, inhuman and posthuman might mean in the 21st century. %7 First %@ 9781350231443
Braidotti, R., & Klumbytė, G. (2022). Posthuman Care. In R. Braidotti, E. Jones, & G. Klumbytė (Eds.), More Posthuman Glossary (pp. 105-106). Bloomsbury Publishing.
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
@incollection{braidotti2022posthuman, author = {Braidotti, Rosi and Klumbytė, Goda}, booktitle = {More Posthuman Glossary}, editor = {Braidotti, Rosi and Jones, Emily and Klumbytė, Goda}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {105-106}, publisher = {Bloomsbury Publishing}, title = {Posthuman Care}, year = 2022 }
%0 Book Section %1 braidotti2022posthuman %A Braidotti, Rosi %A Klumbytė, Goda %B More Posthuman Glossary %D 2022 %E Braidotti, Rosi %E Jones, Emily %E Klumbytė, Goda %I Bloomsbury Publishing %P 105-106 %T Posthuman Care
Dankwa, N. K. (2022). Traversing the Insider’s Path toward Equitable Research Practices for Migrants. Interactions, 29(2), 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/3512330
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
In this forum we explore different perspectives for how to apply intersectionality as a critical framework for design across multiple contexts. --- Yolanda A. Rankin and Jakita O. Thomas, Editors
@article{10.1145/3512330, abstract = {In this forum we explore different perspectives for how to apply intersectionality as a critical framework for design across multiple contexts. — Yolanda A. Rankin and Jakita O. Thomas, Editors}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, author = {Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa}, journal = {Interactions}, keywords = {itegpub}, month = {feb}, number = 2, pages = {62–65}, publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery}, title = {Traversing the Insider's Path toward Equitable Research Practices for Migrants}, volume = 29, year = 2022 }
%0 Journal Article %1 10.1145/3512330 %A Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa %C New York, NY, USA %D 2022 %I Association for Computing Machinery %J Interactions %N 2 %P 62–65 %R 10.1145/3512330 %T Traversing the Insider's Path toward Equitable Research Practices for Migrants %U https://doi.org/10.1145/3512330 %V 29 %X In this forum we explore different perspectives for how to apply intersectionality as a critical framework for design across multiple contexts. --- Yolanda A. Rankin and Jakita O. Thomas, Editors
Draude, C., Gruhl, C., Hornung, G., Kropf, J., Lamla, J., Leimeister, J. M., Sick, B., & Stumme, G. (2022). Social Machines. Informatik Spektrum, 45(1), 38-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-021-01421-4
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
Social Machines sind ein Paradigma für die Gestaltung soziotechnischer Systeme, die unter Verwendung von Web- und Plattformlösungen das Potenzial digitaler Technologien mit der Eigenlogik sozialer Interaktion, Organisation und Strukturbildung auf neue Weise zusammenführen. Im Folgenden diskutieren wir das Paradigma der Social Machine aus den Perspektiven der Informatik, der Wirtschaftsinformatik, der Soziologie und des Rechts, um Orientierungspunkte für seine Gestaltung zu identifizieren. Der Begriff ist in der Literatur jedoch bisher nicht abschließend definiert sondern nur durch Beispiele illustriert.
@article{draude2022social, abstract = {Social Machines sind ein Paradigma für die Gestaltung soziotechnischer Systeme, die unter Verwendung von Web- und Plattformlösungen das Potenzial digitaler Technologien mit der Eigenlogik sozialer Interaktion, Organisation und Strukturbildung auf neue Weise zusammenführen. Im Folgenden diskutieren wir das Paradigma der Social Machine aus den Perspektiven der Informatik, der Wirtschaftsinformatik, der Soziologie und des Rechts, um Orientierungspunkte für seine Gestaltung zu identifizieren. Der Begriff ist in der Literatur jedoch bisher nicht abschließend definiert sondern nur durch Beispiele illustriert.}, author = {Draude, Claude and Gruhl, Christian and Hornung, Gerrit and Kropf, Jonathan and Lamla, Jörn and Leimeister, Jan Marco and Sick, Bernhard and Stumme, Gerd}, journal = {Informatik Spektrum}, keywords = {itegpub}, month = {nov}, number = 1, pages = {38–42}, title = {Social Machines}, volume = 45, year = 2022 }
%0 Journal Article %1 draude2022social %A Draude, Claude %A Gruhl, Christian %A Hornung, Gerrit %A Kropf, Jonathan %A Lamla, Jörn %A Leimeister, Jan Marco %A Sick, Bernhard %A Stumme, Gerd %D 2022 %J Informatik Spektrum %N 1 %P 38--42 %R 10.1007/s00287-021-01421-4 %T Social Machines %U https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-021-01421-4 %V 45 %X Social Machines sind ein Paradigma für die Gestaltung soziotechnischer Systeme, die unter Verwendung von Web- und Plattformlösungen das Potenzial digitaler Technologien mit der Eigenlogik sozialer Interaktion, Organisation und Strukturbildung auf neue Weise zusammenführen. Im Folgenden diskutieren wir das Paradigma der Social Machine aus den Perspektiven der Informatik, der Wirtschaftsinformatik, der Soziologie und des Rechts, um Orientierungspunkte für seine Gestaltung zu identifizieren. Der Begriff ist in der Literatur jedoch bisher nicht abschließend definiert sondern nur durch Beispiele illustriert.
Draude, C., Hornung, G., & Klumbytė, G. (2022). Mapping Data Justice as a Multidimensional Concept Through Feminist and Legal Perspectives. In A. Hepp, J. Jarke, & L. Kramp (Eds.), New Perspectives in Critical Data Studies: The Ambivalences of Data Power (pp. 187-216). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96180-0_9
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
This chapter interrogates ``data justice'' through the lenses of feminist and legal studies to reconfigure data justice as a multidimensional, interdisciplinary practice in IT-design. First, we look at how data justice is framed in feminist research and feminist-informed critical data and design perspectives, as well as how it is conceptualised in law, particularly in the context of the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and legal debates around privacy in Europe. Second, we recommend conceptual shifts, design approaches, and legal measures towards data justice. Our chapter contributes to new perspectives in critical data studies by showing that data justice can provide a conceptual ground that serves both the needs of legal formalisation as well as feminist imperatives of contextualisation and specificity.
@inbook{Draude2022, abstract = {This chapter interrogates ``data justice'' through the lenses of feminist and legal studies to reconfigure data justice as a multidimensional, interdisciplinary practice in IT-design. First, we look at how data justice is framed in feminist research and feminist-informed critical data and design perspectives, as well as how it is conceptualised in law, particularly in the context of the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and legal debates around privacy in Europe. Second, we recommend conceptual shifts, design approaches, and legal measures towards data justice. Our chapter contributes to new perspectives in critical data studies by showing that data justice can provide a conceptual ground that serves both the needs of legal formalisation as well as feminist imperatives of contextualisation and specificity.}, address = {Cham}, author = {Draude, Claude and Hornung, Gerrit and Klumbytė, Goda}, booktitle = {New Perspectives in Critical Data Studies: The Ambivalences of Data Power}, editor = {Hepp, Andreas and Jarke, Juliane and Kramp, Leif}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {187–216}, publisher = {Springer International Publishing}, title = {Mapping Data Justice as a Multidimensional Concept Through Feminist and Legal Perspectives}, year = 2022 }
%0 Book Section %1 Draude2022 %A Draude, Claude %A Hornung, Gerrit %A Klumbytė, Goda %B New Perspectives in Critical Data Studies: The Ambivalences of Data Power %C Cham %D 2022 %E Hepp, Andreas %E Jarke, Juliane %E Kramp, Leif %I Springer International Publishing %P 187--216 %R 10.1007/978-3-030-96180-0_9 %T Mapping Data Justice as a Multidimensional Concept Through Feminist and Legal Perspectives %U https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96180-0_9 %X This chapter interrogates ``data justice'' through the lenses of feminist and legal studies to reconfigure data justice as a multidimensional, interdisciplinary practice in IT-design. First, we look at how data justice is framed in feminist research and feminist-informed critical data and design perspectives, as well as how it is conceptualised in law, particularly in the context of the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and legal debates around privacy in Europe. Second, we recommend conceptual shifts, design approaches, and legal measures towards data justice. Our chapter contributes to new perspectives in critical data studies by showing that data justice can provide a conceptual ground that serves both the needs of legal formalisation as well as feminist imperatives of contextualisation and specificity. %@ 978-3-030-96180-0
Draude, C., & Klumbytė, G. (2022). Hybrid Spaces, Hybrid Methodologies: Finding Ways of Working with Social Sciences and Humanities in Human-Computer Interaction. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction. Theoretical Approaches and Design Methods (Vols 13302, pp. 40-56). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05311-5_3
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
Starting from the need for responsible research and innovation in computing, this paper addresses the challenges that come from working with the social sciences and the humanities in human-computer interaction. In this paper, we attempt to move beyond interdisciplinarity towards transdisciplinarity. In particular, we explore concepts of hybridity and third spaces that are used in HCI participatory design practices. We trace back the postcolonial, decolonial and feminist scholarship basis of these concepts and look at how their critical potential can inform a conceptualization of what we call hybrid methodology in its own right. For this, we present three case studies. The first two work with experimental spaces in artistic research and research through design, the third works with intersectional critical and speculative methodologies in machine learning systems design. The first two case studies center around the discussions of disciplinary openness through experimentation as a way of moving beyond interdisciplinarity towards transdisciplinarity; the third zooms in on the role of critical theoretical knowledge from the social sciences and the humanities as knowledge that enables new orientations in research and design of IT systems.
@inproceedings{10.1007/978-3-031-05311-5_3, abstract = {Starting from the need for responsible research and innovation in computing, this paper addresses the challenges that come from working with the social sciences and the humanities in human-computer interaction. In this paper, we attempt to move beyond interdisciplinarity towards transdisciplinarity. In particular, we explore concepts of hybridity and third spaces that are used in HCI participatory design practices. We trace back the postcolonial, decolonial and feminist scholarship basis of these concepts and look at how their critical potential can inform a conceptualization of what we call hybrid methodology in its own right. For this, we present three case studies. The first two work with experimental spaces in artistic research and research through design, the third works with intersectional critical and speculative methodologies in machine learning systems design. The first two case studies center around the discussions of disciplinary openness through experimentation as a way of moving beyond interdisciplinarity towards transdisciplinarity; the third zooms in on the role of critical theoretical knowledge from the social sciences and the humanities as knowledge that enables new orientations in research and design of IT systems.}, address = {Cham}, author = {Draude, Claude and Klumbytė, Goda}, booktitle = {Human-Computer Interaction. Theoretical Approaches and Design Methods}, editor = {Kurosu, Masaaki}, keywords = {itegpub}, month = {jun}, pages = {40–56}, publisher = {Springer International Publishing}, series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science}, title = {Hybrid Spaces, Hybrid Methodologies: Finding Ways of Working with Social Sciences and Humanities in Human-Computer Interaction}, volume = 13302, year = 2022 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 10.1007/978-3-031-05311-5_3 %A Draude, Claude %A Klumbytė, Goda %B Human-Computer Interaction. Theoretical Approaches and Design Methods %C Cham %D 2022 %E Kurosu, Masaaki %I Springer International Publishing %P 40--56 %R 10.1007/978-3-031-05311-5_3 %T Hybrid Spaces, Hybrid Methodologies: Finding Ways of Working with Social Sciences and Humanities in Human-Computer Interaction %V 13302 %X Starting from the need for responsible research and innovation in computing, this paper addresses the challenges that come from working with the social sciences and the humanities in human-computer interaction. In this paper, we attempt to move beyond interdisciplinarity towards transdisciplinarity. In particular, we explore concepts of hybridity and third spaces that are used in HCI participatory design practices. We trace back the postcolonial, decolonial and feminist scholarship basis of these concepts and look at how their critical potential can inform a conceptualization of what we call hybrid methodology in its own right. For this, we present three case studies. The first two work with experimental spaces in artistic research and research through design, the third works with intersectional critical and speculative methodologies in machine learning systems design. The first two case studies center around the discussions of disciplinary openness through experimentation as a way of moving beyond interdisciplinarity towards transdisciplinarity; the third zooms in on the role of critical theoretical knowledge from the social sciences and the humanities as knowledge that enables new orientations in research and design of IT systems. %@ 978-3-031-05311-5
Horn, V., Engert, S., & Draude, C. (2022). Rethinking business models as sociotechnical intersections in data-economy that should be designed participatively. In K. Marky, U. Grünefeld, & T. Kosch (Eds.), Mensch und Computer 2022 - Workshopband. Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2022-mci-ws02-236
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
@inproceedings{mci/Horn2022, address = {Bonn}, author = {Horn, Viktoria and Engert, Simon and Draude, Claude}, booktitle = {Mensch und Computer 2022 - Workshopband}, editor = {Marky, Karola and Grünefeld, Uwe and Kosch, Thomas}, keywords = {itegpub}, publisher = {Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.}, title = {Rethinking business models as sociotechnical intersections in data-economy that should be designed participatively}, year = 2022 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 mci/Horn2022 %A Horn, Viktoria %A Engert, Simon %A Draude, Claude %B Mensch und Computer 2022 - Workshopband %C Bonn %D 2022 %E Marky, Karola %E Grünefeld, Uwe %E Kosch, Thomas %I Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. %R 10.18420/muc2022-mci-ws02-236 %T Rethinking business models as sociotechnical intersections in data-economy that should be designed participatively
Klumbytė, G. (2022). Almanac: Algorithmic Kinning. Matter: Journal of New Materialist Research, 3(1), 160-164. https://doi.org/10.1344/jnmr.v3i1.38962
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
@article{klumbyte2022almanac, author = {Klumbytė, Goda}, journal = {Matter: Journal of New Materialist Research}, keywords = {itegpub}, month = {feb}, number = 1, pages = {160-164}, title = {Almanac: Algorithmic Kinning}, volume = 3, year = 2022 }
%0 Journal Article %1 klumbyte2022almanac %A Klumbytė, Goda %D 2022 %J Matter: Journal of New Materialist Research %N 1 %P 160-164 %R 10.1344/jnmr.v3i1.38962 %T Almanac: Algorithmic Kinning %V 3
Klumbytė, G., Britton, R. L., Laiti, O., Prado de O. Martins, L., Snelting, F., & Ward, C. (2022). Intraview: Speculative Materialities, Indigenous Worldings and Decolonial Futures in Computing & Design. Matter: Journal of New Materialist Research, 3(1), 182-196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1344/jnmr.v3i1.38967
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
@article{klumbyte2022, author = {Klumbytė, Goda and Britton, Ren Loren and Laiti, Outi and Prado de O. Martins, Luiza and Snelting, Femke and Ward, Caroline}, journal = {Matter: Journal of New Materialist Research}, keywords = {itegpub}, month = {feb}, number = 1, pages = {182-196}, title = {Intraview: Speculative Materialities, Indigenous Worldings and Decolonial Futures in Computing & Design}, volume = 3, year = 2022 }
%0 Journal Article %1 klumbyte2022 %A Klumbytė, Goda %A Britton, Ren Loren %A Laiti, Outi %A Prado de O. Martins, Luiza %A Snelting, Femke %A Ward, Caroline %D 2022 %J Matter: Journal of New Materialist Research %N 1 %P 182-196 %R https://doi.org/10.1344/jnmr.v3i1.38967 %T Intraview: Speculative Materialities, Indigenous Worldings and Decolonial Futures in Computing & Design %V 3
Klumbytė, G., & Draude, C. (2022). Prospects for a New Materialist Informatics: Introduction to a Special Issue. Matter: Journal of New Materialist Research, 3(1), I-XIV. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1344/jnmr.v3i1.38955
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
@article{klumbyte2022prospects, author = {Klumbytė, Goda and Draude, Claude}, journal = {Matter: Journal of New Materialist Research}, keywords = {itegpub}, month = {feb}, number = 1, pages = {I-XIV}, title = {Prospects for a New Materialist Informatics: Introduction to a Special Issue}, volume = 3, year = 2022 }
%0 Journal Article %1 klumbyte2022prospects %A Klumbytė, Goda %A Draude, Claude %D 2022 %J Matter: Journal of New Materialist Research %N 1 %P I-XIV %R https://doi.org/10.1344/jnmr.v3i1.38955 %T Prospects for a New Materialist Informatics: Introduction to a Special Issue %V 3
Klumbytė, G., & Draude, C. (2022). New Materialist Informatics. In R. Braidotti, E. Jones, & G. Klumbytė (Eds.), More Posthuman Glossary (pp. 85-87). Bloomsbury Publishing.
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
@incollection{klumbyt2022materialist, author = {Klumbytė, Goda and Draude, Claude}, booktitle = {More Posthuman Glossary}, editor = {Braidotti, Rosi and Jones, Emily and Klumbytė, Goda}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {85-87}, publisher = {Bloomsbury Publishing}, title = {New Materialist Informatics}, year = 2022 }
%0 Book Section %1 klumbyt2022materialist %A Klumbytė, Goda %A Draude, Claude %B More Posthuman Glossary %D 2022 %E Braidotti, Rosi %E Jones, Emily %E Klumbytė, Goda %I Bloomsbury Publishing %P 85-87 %T New Materialist Informatics
Prospects for a New Materialist Informatics. (2022). In G. Klumbytė & C. Draude (Eds.), Matter: Journal of New Materialist Research (No. 1; Vols 3, Issue 1). https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/matter/issue/view/2720
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
@periodical{klumbyte2022prospects, editor = {Klumbytė, Goda and Draude, Claude}, journal = {Matter: Journal of New Materialist Research}, keywords = {itegpub}, month = {feb}, number = 1, title = {Prospects for a New Materialist Informatics}, volume = 3, year = 2022 }
%0 Generic %1 klumbyte2022prospects %D 2022 %E Klumbytė, Goda %E Draude, Claude %J Matter: Journal of New Materialist Research %N 1 %T Prospects for a New Materialist Informatics %U https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/matter/issue/view/2720 %V 3
Klumbytė, G., Draude, C., & Taylor, A. S. (2022). Critical Tools for Machine Learning: Working with Intersectional Critical Concepts in Machine Learning Systems Design. 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 1528–1541. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533207
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
This paper investigates how intersectional critical theoretical concepts from social sciences and humanities research can be worked with in machine learning systems design. It does so by presenting a case study of a series of speculative design workshops, conducted in 2021. These workshops drew on intersectional feminist methodologies to construct interdisciplinary interventions in the design of machine learning systems, towards more inclusive, accountable, and contextualized systems design. The concepts of “situating/situated knowledges”, "figuration", "diffraction", and “critical fabulation/speculation” were taken up as theoretical and methodological tools for concept-led design workshops. This paper presents the design framework of the workshops and highlights tensions and possibilities with regards to interdisciplinary machine learning systems design towards more inclusive, contextualized, and accountable systems. It discusses the role that critical theoretical concepts can play in a design process and shows how such concepts can work as methodological tools that nonetheless require an open-ended experimental space to function. It presents insights and discussion points regarding what it means to work with critical intersectional knowledge that is inextricably connected to its historical and socio-political roots, and how this reframes what it might mean to design fair and accountable systems.
@inproceedings{10.1145/3531146.3533207, abstract = {This paper investigates how intersectional critical theoretical concepts from social sciences and humanities research can be worked with in machine learning systems design. It does so by presenting a case study of a series of speculative design workshops, conducted in 2021. These workshops drew on intersectional feminist methodologies to construct interdisciplinary interventions in the design of machine learning systems, towards more inclusive, accountable, and contextualized systems design. The concepts of “situating/situated knowledges”, "figuration", "diffraction", and “critical fabulation/speculation” were taken up as theoretical and methodological tools for concept-led design workshops. This paper presents the design framework of the workshops and highlights tensions and possibilities with regards to interdisciplinary machine learning systems design towards more inclusive, contextualized, and accountable systems. It discusses the role that critical theoretical concepts can play in a design process and shows how such concepts can work as methodological tools that nonetheless require an open-ended experimental space to function. It presents insights and discussion points regarding what it means to work with critical intersectional knowledge that is inextricably connected to its historical and socio-political roots, and how this reframes what it might mean to design fair and accountable systems.}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, author = {Klumbytė, Goda and Draude, Claude and Taylor, Alex S.}, booktitle = {2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {1528–1541}, publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery}, series = {FAccT '22}, title = {Critical Tools for Machine Learning: Working with Intersectional Critical Concepts in Machine Learning Systems Design}, year = 2022 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 10.1145/3531146.3533207 %A Klumbytė, Goda %A Draude, Claude %A Taylor, Alex S. %B 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency %C New York, NY, USA %D 2022 %I Association for Computing Machinery %P 1528–1541 %R 10.1145/3531146.3533207 %T Critical Tools for Machine Learning: Working with Intersectional Critical Concepts in Machine Learning Systems Design %U https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533207 %X This paper investigates how intersectional critical theoretical concepts from social sciences and humanities research can be worked with in machine learning systems design. It does so by presenting a case study of a series of speculative design workshops, conducted in 2021. These workshops drew on intersectional feminist methodologies to construct interdisciplinary interventions in the design of machine learning systems, towards more inclusive, accountable, and contextualized systems design. The concepts of “situating/situated knowledges”, "figuration", "diffraction", and “critical fabulation/speculation” were taken up as theoretical and methodological tools for concept-led design workshops. This paper presents the design framework of the workshops and highlights tensions and possibilities with regards to interdisciplinary machine learning systems design towards more inclusive, contextualized, and accountable systems. It discusses the role that critical theoretical concepts can play in a design process and shows how such concepts can work as methodological tools that nonetheless require an open-ended experimental space to function. It presents insights and discussion points regarding what it means to work with critical intersectional knowledge that is inextricably connected to its historical and socio-political roots, and how this reframes what it might mean to design fair and accountable systems. %@ 9781450393522
Mucha, H., de Barros, A. C., Benjamin, J. J., Benzmüller, C., Bischof, A., Buchmüller, S., de Carvalho, A., Dhungel, A.-K., Draude, C., Fleck, M.-J., Jarke, J., Klein, S., Kortekaas, C., Kurze, A., Linke, D., Maas, F., Marsden, N., Melo, R., Michel, S., … Berger, A. (2022). Collaborative Speculations on Future Themes for Participatory Design in Germany. I-com, 21(2), 283-298. https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2021-0030
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
Participatory Design means recognizing that those who will be affected by a future technology should have an active say in its creation. Yet, despite continuous interest in involving people as future users and consumers into designing novel and innovative future technology, participatory approaches in technology design remain relatively underdeveloped in the German HCI community. This article brings together the diversity of voices, domains, perspectives, approaches, and methods that collectively shape Participatory Design in Germany. In the following, we (1) outline our understanding of participatory practice and how it is different from mere user involvement; (2) reflect current issues of participatory and fair technology design within the German Participatory Design community; and (3) discuss tensions relevant to the field, that we expect to arise in the future, and which we derived from our 2021 workshop through a speculative method. We contribute an introduction and an overview of current themes and a speculative outlook on future issues of Participatory Design in Germany. It is meant to inform, provoke, inspire and, ultimately, invite participation within the wider Computer Science community.
@article{MuchaCorreiadeBarrosBenjaminBenzmüllerBischofBuchmüllerdeCarvalhoDhungelDraudeFleckJarkeKleinKortekaasKurzeLinkeMaasMarsdenMeloMichelMüllerBirnPröbsterRießenbergerSchäferSörriesStilkeVolkmannWeibertWeinholdWolfZornHeidtBerger+2022+283+298, abstract = {Participatory Design means recognizing that those who will be affected by a future technology should have an active say in its creation. Yet, despite continuous interest in involving people as future users and consumers into designing novel and innovative future technology, participatory approaches in technology design remain relatively underdeveloped in the German HCI community. This article brings together the diversity of voices, domains, perspectives, approaches, and methods that collectively shape Participatory Design in Germany. In the following, we (1) outline our understanding of participatory practice and how it is different from mere user involvement; (2) reflect current issues of participatory and fair technology design within the German Participatory Design community; and (3) discuss tensions relevant to the field, that we expect to arise in the future, and which we derived from our 2021 workshop through a speculative method. We contribute an introduction and an overview of current themes and a speculative outlook on future issues of Participatory Design in Germany. It is meant to inform, provoke, inspire and, ultimately, invite participation within the wider Computer Science community.}, author = {Mucha, Henrik and de Barros, Ana Correia and Benjamin, Jesse Josua and Benzmüller, Christoph and Bischof, Andreas and Buchmüller, Sandra and de Carvalho, Alexandra and Dhungel, Anna-Katharina and Draude, Claude and Fleck, Marc-Julian and Jarke, Juliane and Klein, Stefanie and Kortekaas, Caroline and Kurze, Albrecht and Linke, Diane and Maas, Franzisca and Marsden, Nicola and Melo, Ricardo and Michel, Susanne and Müller-Birn, Claudia and Pröbster, Monika and Rießenberger, Katja Antonia and Schäfer, Mirko Tobias and Sörries, Peter and Stilke, Julia and Volkmann, Torben and Weibert, Anne and Weinhold, Wilhelm and Wolf, Sara and Zorn, Isabel and Heidt, Michael and Berger, Arne}, journal = {i-com}, keywords = {itegpub}, number = 2, pages = {283–298}, title = {Collaborative Speculations on Future Themes for Participatory Design in Germany}, volume = 21, year = 2022 }
%0 Journal Article %1 MuchaCorreiadeBarrosBenjaminBenzmüllerBischofBuchmüllerdeCarvalhoDhungelDraudeFleckJarkeKleinKortekaasKurzeLinkeMaasMarsdenMeloMichelMüllerBirnPröbsterRießenbergerSchäferSörriesStilkeVolkmannWeibertWeinholdWolfZornHeidtBerger+2022+283+298 %A Mucha, Henrik %A de Barros, Ana Correia %A Benjamin, Jesse Josua %A Benzmüller, Christoph %A Bischof, Andreas %A Buchmüller, Sandra %A de Carvalho, Alexandra %A Dhungel, Anna-Katharina %A Draude, Claude %A Fleck, Marc-Julian %A Jarke, Juliane %A Klein, Stefanie %A Kortekaas, Caroline %A Kurze, Albrecht %A Linke, Diane %A Maas, Franzisca %A Marsden, Nicola %A Melo, Ricardo %A Michel, Susanne %A Müller-Birn, Claudia %A Pröbster, Monika %A Rießenberger, Katja Antonia %A Schäfer, Mirko Tobias %A Sörries, Peter %A Stilke, Julia %A Volkmann, Torben %A Weibert, Anne %A Weinhold, Wilhelm %A Wolf, Sara %A Zorn, Isabel %A Heidt, Michael %A Berger, Arne %D 2022 %J i-com %N 2 %P 283--298 %R 10.1515/icom-2021-0030 %T Collaborative Speculations on Future Themes for Participatory Design in Germany %U https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2021-0030 %V 21 %X Participatory Design means recognizing that those who will be affected by a future technology should have an active say in its creation. Yet, despite continuous interest in involving people as future users and consumers into designing novel and innovative future technology, participatory approaches in technology design remain relatively underdeveloped in the German HCI community. This article brings together the diversity of voices, domains, perspectives, approaches, and methods that collectively shape Participatory Design in Germany. In the following, we (1) outline our understanding of participatory practice and how it is different from mere user involvement; (2) reflect current issues of participatory and fair technology design within the German Participatory Design community; and (3) discuss tensions relevant to the field, that we expect to arise in the future, and which we derived from our 2021 workshop through a speculative method. We contribute an introduction and an overview of current themes and a speculative outlook on future issues of Participatory Design in Germany. It is meant to inform, provoke, inspire and, ultimately, invite participation within the wider Computer Science community.
Rouvroy, A., & Klumbytė, G. (2022). Algoritmic governmentality. In R. Braidotti, E. Jones, & G. Klumbytė (Eds.), More Posthuman Glossary (pp. 10-11). Bloomsbury Publishing.
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
@incollection{rouvroy2022algoritmic, author = {Rouvroy, Antoinette and Klumbytė, Goda}, booktitle = {More Posthuman Glossary}, editor = {Braidotti, Rosi and Jones, Emily and Klumbytė, Goda}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {10-11}, publisher = {Bloomsbury Publishing}, title = {Algoritmic governmentality}, year = 2022 }
%0 Book Section %1 rouvroy2022algoritmic %A Rouvroy, Antoinette %A Klumbytė, Goda %B More Posthuman Glossary %D 2022 %E Braidotti, Rosi %E Jones, Emily %E Klumbytė, Goda %I Bloomsbury Publishing %P 10-11 %T Algoritmic governmentality
Urbelis, T. (2022). Sharing Grounded Hope in the Age of Algorithmic Harm and Resistance. An interview with Goda Klumbytė. Interview from Lithuania; echo gone wrong. https://echogonewrong.com/sharing-grounded-hope-in-the-age-of-algorithmic-harm-and-resistance-an-interview-with-goda-klumbyte/
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
@electronic{urbelis2022sharing, author = {Urbelis, Tautvydas}, keywords = {itegpub}, publisher = {echo gone wrong}, series = {Interview from Lithuania}, title = {Sharing Grounded Hope in the Age of Algorithmic Harm and Resistance. An interview with Goda Klumbytė}, type = {Interview}, year = 2022 }
%0 Generic %1 urbelis2022sharing %A Urbelis, Tautvydas %B Interview from Lithuania %D 2022 %I echo gone wrong %T Sharing Grounded Hope in the Age of Algorithmic Harm and Resistance. An interview with Goda Klumbytė %U https://echogonewrong.com/sharing-grounded-hope-in-the-age-of-algorithmic-harm-and-resistance-an-interview-with-goda-klumbyte/

2021[ to top ]

Britton, L., Klumbytė, G., Draude, C., & Paehr, I. (2021). Getting a Handle on Critical Pedagogies: Notes on Interdependencies and Care in Interdisciplinary Technoscience. In J. Büssers, A. Faulhaber, M. Raboldt, & R. Wiesner (Eds.), Gendered Configurations of Humans and Machines (Vols 8, pp. 265-281). Barbara Budrich.
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
@inbook{britton2021getting, author = {Britton, Loren and Klumbytė, Goda and Draude, Claude and Paehr, Isabel}, booktitle = {Gendered Configurations of Humans and Machines}, editor = {Büssers, Jan and Faulhaber, Anja and Raboldt, Myriam and Wiesner, Rebecca}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {265-281}, publisher = {Barbara Budrich}, series = {L'AGENda}, title = {Getting a Handle on Critical Pedagogies: Notes on Interdependencies and Care in Interdisciplinary Technoscience}, volume = 8, year = 2021 }
%0 Book Section %1 britton2021getting %A Britton, Loren %A Klumbytė, Goda %A Draude, Claude %A Paehr, Isabel %B Gendered Configurations of Humans and Machines %D 2021 %E Büssers, Jan %E Faulhaber, Anja %E Raboldt, Myriam %E Wiesner, Rebecca %I Barbara Budrich %P 265-281 %T Getting a Handle on Critical Pedagogies: Notes on Interdependencies and Care in Interdisciplinary Technoscience %V 8 %@ 978-3-8474-2494-9
Dankwa, N. K. (2021). “All Names Are Pseudonyms”: A Critical Reflection on Pseudonymizing Names in HCI: “All Names Are Pseudonyms”. CHI EA ’21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 34, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450376
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
A person's name embodies identity. During user studies in Human Computer Interaction (HCI), persons are often renamed (pseudonymization) to hide their identity for privacy and ethical reasons. Pseudonymization occurs mostly as a “silent” affair of due diligence. Researchers barely give substantial information to the process nor reveal a reflexive position nor acknowledge the underlying elements of power and identity negotiation. As HCI advances in mitigating the design of biased technologies and breaking oppressive structures, I argue, in this paper, the need for the field to re-consider research requirements such as pseudonymization as possible to embody oppressive structures and erase identity. I present a review of papers from the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘20) that illustrate how silent the HCI approach is. My argument is built on Critical Race Theory, questioning the objectivity of such technical requirements. I use personal narratives to bolster this argument, ending with a call to the HCI community to acknowledge the power and privilege in renaming participants with three recommendations for consideration.
@inproceedings{kesewaadankwa2021names, abstract = {A person's name embodies identity. During user studies in Human Computer Interaction (HCI), persons are often renamed (pseudonymization) to hide their identity for privacy and ethical reasons. Pseudonymization occurs mostly as a “silent” affair of due diligence. Researchers barely give substantial information to the process nor reveal a reflexive position nor acknowledge the underlying elements of power and identity negotiation. As HCI advances in mitigating the design of biased technologies and breaking oppressive structures, I argue, in this paper, the need for the field to re-consider research requirements such as pseudonymization as possible to embody oppressive structures and erase identity. I present a review of papers from the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘20) that illustrate how silent the HCI approach is. My argument is built on Critical Race Theory, questioning the objectivity of such technical requirements. I use personal narratives to bolster this argument, ending with a call to the HCI community to acknowledge the power and privilege in renaming participants with three recommendations for consideration.}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, author = {Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa}, booktitle = {CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems}, keywords = {itegpub}, number = 34, pages = {1-6}, publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery}, title = {“All Names Are Pseudonyms”: A Critical Reflection on Pseudonymizing Names in HCI: “All Names Are Pseudonyms”}, year = 2021 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 kesewaadankwa2021names %A Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa %B CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems %C New York, NY, USA %D 2021 %I Association for Computing Machinery %N 34 %P 1-6 %R 10.1145/3411763.3450376 %T “All Names Are Pseudonyms”: A Critical Reflection on Pseudonymizing Names in HCI: “All Names Are Pseudonyms” %U https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450376 %X A person's name embodies identity. During user studies in Human Computer Interaction (HCI), persons are often renamed (pseudonymization) to hide their identity for privacy and ethical reasons. Pseudonymization occurs mostly as a “silent” affair of due diligence. Researchers barely give substantial information to the process nor reveal a reflexive position nor acknowledge the underlying elements of power and identity negotiation. As HCI advances in mitigating the design of biased technologies and breaking oppressive structures, I argue, in this paper, the need for the field to re-consider research requirements such as pseudonymization as possible to embody oppressive structures and erase identity. I present a review of papers from the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘20) that illustrate how silent the HCI approach is. My argument is built on Critical Race Theory, questioning the objectivity of such technical requirements. I use personal narratives to bolster this argument, ending with a call to the HCI community to acknowledge the power and privilege in renaming participants with three recommendations for consideration. %@ 9781450380959
Dankwa, N. K., & Draude, C. (2021). Setting Diversity at the Core of HCI. In M. Antona & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design Methods and User Experience (Vols 12768, pp. 39-52). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78092-0_3
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
The advancing awareness of diversity in HCI is touted as laudable in addressing inequality and the digital divide. This progress however has not been reflected in HCI research. Diversity in HCI has focused on giving underrepresented users voice and confronting homogeneity. By increasing representations, though a diversity affinity is immediately visible, the deconstruction of institutionalized prejudice fails. Additionally, underrepresented voices have the unsurmountable task of representing their group. These approaches to diversity become tokenistic fixes failing to tackle the systemic causes of inequality.
@inproceedings{dankwa2021setting, abstract = {The advancing awareness of diversity in HCI is touted as laudable in addressing inequality and the digital divide. This progress however has not been reflected in HCI research. Diversity in HCI has focused on giving underrepresented users voice and confronting homogeneity. By increasing representations, though a diversity affinity is immediately visible, the deconstruction of institutionalized prejudice fails. Additionally, underrepresented voices have the unsurmountable task of representing their group. These approaches to diversity become tokenistic fixes failing to tackle the systemic causes of inequality.}, address = {Cham}, author = {Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa and Draude, Claude}, booktitle = {Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design Methods and User Experience}, editor = {Antona, Margherita and Stephanidis, Constantine}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {39-52}, publisher = {Springer International Publishing}, series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science}, title = {Setting Diversity at the Core of HCI}, volume = 12768, year = 2021 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 dankwa2021setting %A Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa %A Draude, Claude %B Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design Methods and User Experience %C Cham %D 2021 %E Antona, Margherita %E Stephanidis, Constantine %I Springer International Publishing %P 39-52 %R 10.1007/978-3-030-78092-0_3 %T Setting Diversity at the Core of HCI %V 12768 %X The advancing awareness of diversity in HCI is touted as laudable in addressing inequality and the digital divide. This progress however has not been reflected in HCI research. Diversity in HCI has focused on giving underrepresented users voice and confronting homogeneity. By increasing representations, though a diversity affinity is immediately visible, the deconstruction of institutionalized prejudice fails. Additionally, underrepresented voices have the unsurmountable task of representing their group. These approaches to diversity become tokenistic fixes failing to tackle the systemic causes of inequality. %@ 978-3-030-78092-0
Klumbyte, G., Draude, C., & Taylor, A. (2021). Critical Tools for Machine Learning: Situating, Figuring, Diffracting, Fabulating Machine Learning Systems Design. CHItaly 2021: 14th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter. https://doi.org/10.1145/3464385.3467475
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
This workshop draws on feminist and other critical methodologies to construct interdisciplinary interventions in the design of machine learning systems. Theoretical concepts of “figuration”, “situating/situated knowledge”, “critical fabulation/speculation,” and “diffraction” are explored through hands-on experimentation to imagine and design machine learning systems in a more situated, inclusive, contextualize and accountable way. Through this “theory turned practice” approach the workshop aims to address systemic socio-cultural biases and develop more socially responsible frameworks of design. The workshop provides space for building a network for future research on interdisciplinary machine learning systems design.
@inproceedings{10.1145/3464385.3467475, abstract = {This workshop draws on feminist and other critical methodologies to construct interdisciplinary interventions in the design of machine learning systems. Theoretical concepts of “figuration”, “situating/situated knowledge”, “critical fabulation/speculation,” and “diffraction” are explored through hands-on experimentation to imagine and design machine learning systems in a more situated, inclusive, contextualize and accountable way. Through this “theory turned practice” approach the workshop aims to address systemic socio-cultural biases and develop more socially responsible frameworks of design. The workshop provides space for building a network for future research on interdisciplinary machine learning systems design.}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, author = {Klumbyte, Goda and Draude, Claude and Taylor, Alex}, booktitle = {CHItaly 2021: 14th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter}, keywords = {myown}, publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery}, series = {CHItaly '21}, title = {Critical Tools for Machine Learning: Situating, Figuring, Diffracting, Fabulating Machine Learning Systems Design}, year = 2021 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 10.1145/3464385.3467475 %A Klumbyte, Goda %A Draude, Claude %A Taylor, Alex %B CHItaly 2021: 14th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter %C New York, NY, USA %D 2021 %I Association for Computing Machinery %R 10.1145/3464385.3467475 %T Critical Tools for Machine Learning: Situating, Figuring, Diffracting, Fabulating Machine Learning Systems Design %U https://doi.org/10.1145/3464385.3467475 %X This workshop draws on feminist and other critical methodologies to construct interdisciplinary interventions in the design of machine learning systems. Theoretical concepts of “figuration”, “situating/situated knowledge”, “critical fabulation/speculation,” and “diffraction” are explored through hands-on experimentation to imagine and design machine learning systems in a more situated, inclusive, contextualize and accountable way. Through this “theory turned practice” approach the workshop aims to address systemic socio-cultural biases and develop more socially responsible frameworks of design. The workshop provides space for building a network for future research on interdisciplinary machine learning systems design. %@ 9781450389778
Ohly, S., & Draude, C. (2021). The Impact of Gender in Flexible Work: From Highlighting Gender Differences to Understanding Gender Roles in Use of Information and Communication Technology. In C. Korunka (Ed.), Flexible Working Practices and Approaches: Psychological and Social Implications (pp. 79-92). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74128-0_5
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
ICT can contribute to flexible working, but the question arises if women and men differ in the way they use ICT. Re-analyzing data collected in two diary studies comparing men and women on the length of ICT use, the type of positive and negative events in relation to ICT during the day, on the way home and in the evening, revealed little to no gender differences. We conclude that the occupational role overrides potential differences that might occur due to different gender roles and discuss future research opportunities in this area. For example, the question arises against the background of the gendered division of labor if occupational role and other factors determine ICT use, calling for an intersectional analysis.
@inbook{Ohly2021, abstract = {ICT can contribute to flexible working, but the question arises if women and men differ in the way they use ICT. Re-analyzing data collected in two diary studies comparing men and women on the length of ICT use, the type of positive and negative events in relation to ICT during the day, on the way home and in the evening, revealed little to no gender differences. We conclude that the occupational role overrides potential differences that might occur due to different gender roles and discuss future research opportunities in this area. For example, the question arises against the background of the gendered division of labor if occupational role and other factors determine ICT use, calling for an intersectional analysis.}, address = {Cham}, author = {Ohly, Sandra and Draude, Claude}, booktitle = {Flexible Working Practices and Approaches: Psychological and Social Implications}, editor = {Korunka, Christian}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {79-92}, publisher = {Springer International Publishing}, title = {The Impact of Gender in Flexible Work: From Highlighting Gender Differences to Understanding Gender Roles in Use of Information and Communication Technology}, year = 2021 }
%0 Book Section %1 Ohly2021 %A Ohly, Sandra %A Draude, Claude %B Flexible Working Practices and Approaches: Psychological and Social Implications %C Cham %D 2021 %E Korunka, Christian %I Springer International Publishing %P 79-92 %R 10.1007/978-3-030-74128-0_5 %T The Impact of Gender in Flexible Work: From Highlighting Gender Differences to Understanding Gender Roles in Use of Information and Communication Technology %U https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74128-0_5 %X ICT can contribute to flexible working, but the question arises if women and men differ in the way they use ICT. Re-analyzing data collected in two diary studies comparing men and women on the length of ICT use, the type of positive and negative events in relation to ICT during the day, on the way home and in the evening, revealed little to no gender differences. We conclude that the occupational role overrides potential differences that might occur due to different gender roles and discuss future research opportunities in this area. For example, the question arises against the background of the gendered division of labor if occupational role and other factors determine ICT use, calling for an intersectional analysis. %@ 978-3-030-74128-0

2020[ to top ]

Bereswill, M., Draude, C., & Kuhn, H.-P. (2020). Ungleiche Präferenzen? Zum Zusammenhang von Studienfachwahl und Geschlechterzuschreibungen. ZSE Zeitschrift für Soziologie Der Erziehung Und Sozialisation, 40(3), 227-230. https://doi.org/10.3262/ZSE2003227
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
Einführung in den Themenschwerpunkt
@article{bereswill2020ungleiche, abstract = {Einführung in den Themenschwerpunkt}, author = {Bereswill, Mechthild and Draude, Claude and Kuhn, Hans-Peter}, journal = {ZSE Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation}, keywords = {itegpub}, number = 3, pages = {227-230}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, title = {Ungleiche Präferenzen? Zum Zusammenhang von Studienfachwahl und Geschlechterzuschreibungen}, volume = 40, year = 2020 }
%0 Journal Article %1 bereswill2020ungleiche %A Bereswill, Mechthild %A Draude, Claude %A Kuhn, Hans-Peter %D 2020 %I Beltz Juventa %J ZSE Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation %N 3 %P 227-230 %R 10.3262/ZSE2003227 %T Ungleiche Präferenzen? Zum Zusammenhang von Studienfachwahl und Geschlechterzuschreibungen %V 40 %X Einführung in den Themenschwerpunkt
Bereswill, M., Draude, C., Kuhn, H.-P., Bläsing, L. M., Lumpp, G., & Spitzner, J. (2020). Ungleiche Präferenzen? Zum Zusammenhang von Studienfachwahl und Geschlecht aus sozialisations- und geschlechtertheoretischer Perspektive am Beispiel des Studienfachs Informatik. ZSE Zeitschrift für Soziologie Der Erziehung Und Sozialisation, 40(3), 231-253. https://doi.org/10.3262/ZSE2003231
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
Insgesamt zeigen sich bei der Studienfachwahl in Deutschland teilweise große Unterschiede zwischen den Geschlechtern. So studieren Frauen deutlich seltener als Männer Fächer im MINT-Bereich, Männer dagegen deutlich seltener Fächer im sozialen Bereich. Der Beitrag stellt die Frage, warum solche Ungleichheiten trotz zahlreicher bildungspolitischer Interventionen stabil bleiben und sich auf der Ebene der individuellen Entscheidungen entsprechend konventionelle Orientierungen zeigen. Zunächst werden verschiedene Einflussfaktoren hinsichtlich der Studienfachwahl unter einer sozialisations- und entwicklungstheoretischen Perspektive in den Blick genommen. Im Anschluss daran werden die beharrlichen Unterschiede in den individuellen Orientierungen und Entscheidungen von Mädchen und Jungen aus einer geschlechtertheoretischen Perspektive als strukturelle Ungleichheiten eingeordnet. Zuletzt werden die mit diesen strukturellen Ungleichheiten zusammenhängenden Dynamiken von Öffnungen und Schließungen eines sozialen Feldes am Beispiel des Fachs Informatik weiter konkretisiert und es wird gezeigt, dass Veränderungen nur greifen können, wenn eine Fachkultur sich im Hinblick auf systematische Öffnungen wandelt. Im Fazit wird dafür plädiert, die verschiedenen Forschungsstränge und Theorieperspektiven, die im Beitrag aufgenommen werden, in Zukunft noch stärker zu verbinden.
@article{10.3262/ZSE2003231, abstract = {Insgesamt zeigen sich bei der Studienfachwahl in Deutschland teilweise große Unterschiede zwischen den Geschlechtern. So studieren Frauen deutlich seltener als Männer Fächer im MINT-Bereich, Männer dagegen deutlich seltener Fächer im sozialen Bereich. Der Beitrag stellt die Frage, warum solche Ungleichheiten trotz zahlreicher bildungspolitischer Interventionen stabil bleiben und sich auf der Ebene der individuellen Entscheidungen entsprechend konventionelle Orientierungen zeigen. Zunächst werden verschiedene Einflussfaktoren hinsichtlich der Studienfachwahl unter einer sozialisations- und entwicklungstheoretischen Perspektive in den Blick genommen. Im Anschluss daran werden die beharrlichen Unterschiede in den individuellen Orientierungen und Entscheidungen von Mädchen und Jungen aus einer geschlechtertheoretischen Perspektive als strukturelle Ungleichheiten eingeordnet. Zuletzt werden die mit diesen strukturellen Ungleichheiten zusammenhängenden Dynamiken von Öffnungen und Schließungen eines sozialen Feldes am Beispiel des Fachs Informatik weiter konkretisiert und es wird gezeigt, dass Veränderungen nur greifen können, wenn eine Fachkultur sich im Hinblick auf systematische Öffnungen wandelt. Im Fazit wird dafür plädiert, die verschiedenen Forschungsstränge und Theorieperspektiven, die im Beitrag aufgenommen werden, in Zukunft noch stärker zu verbinden.}, author = {Bereswill, Mechthild and Draude, Claude and Kuhn, Hans-Peter and Bläsing, Lisa Marie and Lumpp, Gabriele and Spitzner, Josefine}, journal = {ZSE Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation}, keywords = {stem}, number = 3, pages = {231-253}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, title = {Ungleiche Präferenzen? Zum Zusammenhang von Studienfachwahl und Geschlecht aus sozialisations- und geschlechtertheoretischer Perspektive am Beispiel des Studienfachs Informatik}, volume = 40, year = 2020 }
%0 Journal Article %1 10.3262/ZSE2003231 %A Bereswill, Mechthild %A Draude, Claude %A Kuhn, Hans-Peter %A Bläsing, Lisa Marie %A Lumpp, Gabriele %A Spitzner, Josefine %D 2020 %I Beltz Juventa %J ZSE Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation %N 3 %P 231-253 %R 10.3262/ZSE2003231 %T Ungleiche Präferenzen? Zum Zusammenhang von Studienfachwahl und Geschlecht aus sozialisations- und geschlechtertheoretischer Perspektive am Beispiel des Studienfachs Informatik %V 40 %X Insgesamt zeigen sich bei der Studienfachwahl in Deutschland teilweise große Unterschiede zwischen den Geschlechtern. So studieren Frauen deutlich seltener als Männer Fächer im MINT-Bereich, Männer dagegen deutlich seltener Fächer im sozialen Bereich. Der Beitrag stellt die Frage, warum solche Ungleichheiten trotz zahlreicher bildungspolitischer Interventionen stabil bleiben und sich auf der Ebene der individuellen Entscheidungen entsprechend konventionelle Orientierungen zeigen. Zunächst werden verschiedene Einflussfaktoren hinsichtlich der Studienfachwahl unter einer sozialisations- und entwicklungstheoretischen Perspektive in den Blick genommen. Im Anschluss daran werden die beharrlichen Unterschiede in den individuellen Orientierungen und Entscheidungen von Mädchen und Jungen aus einer geschlechtertheoretischen Perspektive als strukturelle Ungleichheiten eingeordnet. Zuletzt werden die mit diesen strukturellen Ungleichheiten zusammenhängenden Dynamiken von Öffnungen und Schließungen eines sozialen Feldes am Beispiel des Fachs Informatik weiter konkretisiert und es wird gezeigt, dass Veränderungen nur greifen können, wenn eine Fachkultur sich im Hinblick auf systematische Öffnungen wandelt. Im Fazit wird dafür plädiert, die verschiedenen Forschungsstränge und Theorieperspektiven, die im Beitrag aufgenommen werden, in Zukunft noch stärker zu verbinden.
Bläsing, L. M., & Draude, C. (2020). Geschlechterforschungen zwischen Reflexion und Reproduktion bestehender Bilder von Informatik. ZSE Zeitschrift für Soziologie Der Erziehung Und Sozialisation, 40(3), 276-295. https://doi.org/10.3262/ZSE2003276
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
Seit Jahrzehnten wird die geschlechtliche Verteilung von Studierenden in MINT bzw. der Informatik aus unterschiedlichen Perspektiven in den Blick genommen. Aus Sicht geschlechtertheoretischer Forschungen werden dafür unter anderem geschlechtliche Codierungen der Fächer gesehen, in denen sich alltägliches Geschlechterwissen und strukturelle Ungleichheiten manifestieren. In Bildern und Annahmen, die Schüler*innen und Studierende über die jeweiligen Fächer haben, werden diese vergeschlechtlichten Codierungen sichtbar. Der Beitrag fasst Ergebnisse ausgewählter Literatur zu Bildern von Informatik zusammen. Sie zeigen, wie die Befragten Informatik als männliches, weißes und westliches Fach konstruieren, welches Zugangs- und Aufstiegsmöglichkeiten mindestens einschränkt und ‚das Andere‘, also beispielsweise Frauen/Weiblichkeit, alles nicht-westliche, nicht-weiße – bzw. was diesen Begriffen zugeschrieben wird – abwertet. Beiträge zu Informatikbildern laufen jedoch Gefahr, bestehende Bilder zu reproduzieren. Deshalb werden in der untersuchten Literatur Leerstellen und Perspektiven aufgezeigt, die zu einer intersektionalen, reflektierten Forschung über Informatik(bilder) beitragen können.
@article{blasing2020geschlechterforschungen, abstract = {Seit Jahrzehnten wird die geschlechtliche Verteilung von Studierenden in MINT bzw. der Informatik aus unterschiedlichen Perspektiven in den Blick genommen. Aus Sicht geschlechtertheoretischer Forschungen werden dafür unter anderem geschlechtliche Codierungen der Fächer gesehen, in denen sich alltägliches Geschlechterwissen und strukturelle Ungleichheiten manifestieren. In Bildern und Annahmen, die Schüler*innen und Studierende über die jeweiligen Fächer haben, werden diese vergeschlechtlichten Codierungen sichtbar. Der Beitrag fasst Ergebnisse ausgewählter Literatur zu Bildern von Informatik zusammen. Sie zeigen, wie die Befragten Informatik als männliches, weißes und westliches Fach konstruieren, welches Zugangs- und Aufstiegsmöglichkeiten mindestens einschränkt und ‚das Andere‘, also beispielsweise Frauen/Weiblichkeit, alles nicht-westliche, nicht-weiße – bzw. was diesen Begriffen zugeschrieben wird – abwertet. Beiträge zu Informatikbildern laufen jedoch Gefahr, bestehende Bilder zu reproduzieren. Deshalb werden in der untersuchten Literatur Leerstellen und Perspektiven aufgezeigt, die zu einer intersektionalen, reflektierten Forschung über Informatik(bilder) beitragen können.}, author = {Bläsing, Lisa Marie and Draude, Claude}, journal = {ZSE Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation}, keywords = {myown}, number = 3, pages = {276-295}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, title = {Geschlechterforschungen zwischen Reflexion und Reproduktion bestehender Bilder von Informatik}, volume = 40, year = 2020 }
%0 Journal Article %1 blasing2020geschlechterforschungen %A Bläsing, Lisa Marie %A Draude, Claude %D 2020 %I Beltz Juventa %J ZSE Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation %N 3 %P 276-295 %R 10.3262/ZSE2003276 %T Geschlechterforschungen zwischen Reflexion und Reproduktion bestehender Bilder von Informatik %V 40 %X Seit Jahrzehnten wird die geschlechtliche Verteilung von Studierenden in MINT bzw. der Informatik aus unterschiedlichen Perspektiven in den Blick genommen. Aus Sicht geschlechtertheoretischer Forschungen werden dafür unter anderem geschlechtliche Codierungen der Fächer gesehen, in denen sich alltägliches Geschlechterwissen und strukturelle Ungleichheiten manifestieren. In Bildern und Annahmen, die Schüler*innen und Studierende über die jeweiligen Fächer haben, werden diese vergeschlechtlichten Codierungen sichtbar. Der Beitrag fasst Ergebnisse ausgewählter Literatur zu Bildern von Informatik zusammen. Sie zeigen, wie die Befragten Informatik als männliches, weißes und westliches Fach konstruieren, welches Zugangs- und Aufstiegsmöglichkeiten mindestens einschränkt und ‚das Andere‘, also beispielsweise Frauen/Weiblichkeit, alles nicht-westliche, nicht-weiße – bzw. was diesen Begriffen zugeschrieben wird – abwertet. Beiträge zu Informatikbildern laufen jedoch Gefahr, bestehende Bilder zu reproduzieren. Deshalb werden in der untersuchten Literatur Leerstellen und Perspektiven aufgezeigt, die zu einer intersektionalen, reflektierten Forschung über Informatik(bilder) beitragen können.
Britton, L., & Pritchard, H. (2020). CS FIELD MANUAL. Arts of the Working Class. http://artsoftheworkingclass.org/text/for-cs
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
@article{britton2020field, author = {Britton, Loren and Pritchard, Helen}, journal = {Arts of the Working Class}, keywords = {itegpub}, title = {CS FIELD MANUAL}, year = 2020 }
%0 Journal Article %1 britton2020field %A Britton, Loren %A Pritchard, Helen %D 2020 %J Arts of the Working Class %T CS FIELD MANUAL %U http://artsoftheworkingclass.org/text/for-cs
Britton, L., & Pritchard, H. (2020). CS Field Manual. Disappointment Reader. https://kunsthalle.osnabrueck.de/media/pages/shop/publikationen/still-halten/267ce317de-1602845711/reader-enttaeuschung-2020-kunsthalleosnabrueck.pdf
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
@article{britton2020field, author = {Britton, Loren and Pritchard, Helen}, journal = {Disappointment Reader}, keywords = {itegpub}, publisher = {Kunsthalle Osnabrück}, title = {CS Field Manual}, year = 2020 }
%0 Journal Article %1 britton2020field %A Britton, Loren %A Pritchard, Helen %D 2020 %I Kunsthalle Osnabrück %J Disappointment Reader %T CS Field Manual %U https://kunsthalle.osnabrueck.de/media/pages/shop/publikationen/still-halten/267ce317de-1602845711/reader-enttaeuschung-2020-kunsthalleosnabrueck.pdf
Britton, L., & Pritchard, H. (2020). For CS. Interactions, 27(4), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406838
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
@article{10.1145/3406838, address = {New York, NY, USA}, author = {Britton, Loren and Pritchard, Helen}, journal = {Interactions}, keywords = {itegpub}, month = {jul}, number = 4, pages = {94–98}, publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery}, title = {For CS}, volume = 27, year = 2020 }
%0 Journal Article %1 10.1145/3406838 %A Britton, Loren %A Pritchard, Helen %C New York, NY, USA %D 2020 %I Association for Computing Machinery %J Interactions %N 4 %P 94–98 %R 10.1145/3406838 %T For CS %U https://doi.org/10.1145/3406838 %V 27
Dankwa, N. K. (2020). Diversifying Smart Home Contexts. Proceedings of 18th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. https://doi.org/10.18420/ECSCW2020_DC06
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
Advances in smart home technological innovation over the years has seen an increase in consumer interests. However, research contexts for smart homes tend to skew towards “traditional”living and housing situations. Through my Ph.D. research, I raise awareness of the need to consider other user contexts and living situations. I do this by exploring opportunities for smart home innovation with elderly women who live alone. I work with the elderly women to understand their values, needs, and collaboratively create new smart home devices. The outcome of my research would be smart home devices that support the lives and contexts of elderly women living alone.
@inproceedings{https://doi.org/10.18420/ecscw2020_dc06, abstract = {Advances in smart home technological innovation over the years has seen an increase in consumer interests. However, research contexts for smart homes tend to skew towards “traditional”living and housing situations. Through my Ph.D. research, I raise awareness of the need to consider other user contexts and living situations. I do this by exploring opportunities for smart home innovation with elderly women who live alone. I work with the elderly women to understand their values, needs, and collaboratively create new smart home devices. The outcome of my research would be smart home devices that support the lives and contexts of elderly women living alone.}, author = {Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa}, booktitle = {Proceedings of 18th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work}, keywords = {itegpub}, publisher = {European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET)}, title = {Diversifying Smart Home Contexts}, year = 2020 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 https://doi.org/10.18420/ecscw2020_dc06 %A Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa %B Proceedings of 18th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work %D 2020 %I European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET) %R 10.18420/ECSCW2020_DC06 %T Diversifying Smart Home Contexts %U https://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/4050 %X Advances in smart home technological innovation over the years has seen an increase in consumer interests. However, research contexts for smart homes tend to skew towards “traditional”living and housing situations. Through my Ph.D. research, I raise awareness of the need to consider other user contexts and living situations. I do this by exploring opportunities for smart home innovation with elderly women who live alone. I work with the elderly women to understand their values, needs, and collaboratively create new smart home devices. The outcome of my research would be smart home devices that support the lives and contexts of elderly women living alone.
Dankwa, N. K. (2020). Investigating Smart Home Needs for Elderly Women Who Live Alone. An Interview Study. In C. Stephanidis, M. Antona, & S. Ntoa (Eds.), HCI International 2020 - Late Breaking Posters - 22nd International Conference, HCI 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19-24, 2020, Proceedings, Part II (Vols 1294, pp. 32-38). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/hci/hci2020-49.html#Dankwa20
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
Identity aspects such as gender, race, culture, and socio-economic status should be considered when technologies are designed with and for persons [9]. HCI research in ageing populations can benefit from considering the complexity of identity, use and context of older persons. This short paper draws attention to gender as an aspect of identity in working with ageing populations. It presents results from an interview study with elderly women who live alone in Germany. This study is part of a larger research project dedicated to innovating smart home technologies with and for elderly women who live alone. The research project has comprised of an “exploratory getting-to know each other” session, use experience of a smart speaker and interview studies. This paper presents insights from semi-structured interviews with 7 elderly women who live alone. These insights are also presented as design considerations for smart home technology for elderly women living alone. The study is the basis for further work with the elderly women, which are co-creation sessions to design smart home devices and develop prototypes.
@inproceedings{dankwa2020investigating, abstract = {Identity aspects such as gender, race, culture, and socio-economic status should be considered when technologies are designed with and for persons [9]. HCI research in ageing populations can benefit from considering the complexity of identity, use and context of older persons. This short paper draws attention to gender as an aspect of identity in working with ageing populations. It presents results from an interview study with elderly women who live alone in Germany. This study is part of a larger research project dedicated to innovating smart home technologies with and for elderly women who live alone. The research project has comprised of an “exploratory getting-to know each other” session, use experience of a smart speaker and interview studies. This paper presents insights from semi-structured interviews with 7 elderly women who live alone. These insights are also presented as design considerations for smart home technology for elderly women living alone. The study is the basis for further work with the elderly women, which are co-creation sessions to design smart home devices and develop prototypes.}, author = {Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa}, booktitle = {HCI International 2020 - Late Breaking Posters - 22nd International Conference, HCI 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19-24, 2020, Proceedings, Part II}, editor = {Stephanidis, Constantine and Antona, Margherita and Ntoa, Stavroula}, keywords = {smart_homes}, pages = {32-38}, publisher = {Springer}, series = {Communications in Computer and Information Science}, title = {Investigating Smart Home Needs for Elderly Women Who Live Alone. An Interview Study}, volume = 1294, year = 2020 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 dankwa2020investigating %A Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa %B HCI International 2020 - Late Breaking Posters - 22nd International Conference, HCI 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19-24, 2020, Proceedings, Part II %D 2020 %E Stephanidis, Constantine %E Antona, Margherita %E Ntoa, Stavroula %I Springer %P 32-38 %T Investigating Smart Home Needs for Elderly Women Who Live Alone. An Interview Study %U http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/hci/hci2020-49.html#Dankwa20 %V 1294 %X Identity aspects such as gender, race, culture, and socio-economic status should be considered when technologies are designed with and for persons [9]. HCI research in ageing populations can benefit from considering the complexity of identity, use and context of older persons. This short paper draws attention to gender as an aspect of identity in working with ageing populations. It presents results from an interview study with elderly women who live alone in Germany. This study is part of a larger research project dedicated to innovating smart home technologies with and for elderly women who live alone. The research project has comprised of an “exploratory getting-to know each other” session, use experience of a smart speaker and interview studies. This paper presents insights from semi-structured interviews with 7 elderly women who live alone. These insights are also presented as design considerations for smart home technology for elderly women living alone. The study is the basis for further work with the elderly women, which are co-creation sessions to design smart home devices and develop prototypes. %@ 978-3-030-60702-9
Draude, C. (2020). "Boundaries Do Not Sit Still" from Interaction to Agential Intra-action in HCI. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction. Design and User Experience (Vols 12181, pp. 20-32). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49059-1_2
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
We live in a world that is increasingly shaped through computational technology. The expansion and pervasiveness of computing brings along opportunities and challenges for the field of HCI. New application domains evolve and technological advances pose novel interaction possibilities. But with computing's shaping power comes also the need for increased responsibility and attention to the societal, political and ecological impact of technology. In this conceptual paper, new materialist thinking is employed to locate these societal etc. aspects as inextricably enmeshed within computing research and development. New materialism is a multi-vocal, cross-disciplinary field of doing-thinking. In contrast to Western dichotomic tradition, a monistic, post-anthropocentric perspective is provided and matter as an active agent in world-making is acknowledged. Central to this paper is the questioning of the human and computer dichotomy at the core of the field of HCI. For this, a material-semiotic perspective on human-computer interaction is elaborated upon. Furthermore, the paradigm of interaction is revisited and reworked as a conception of agential intra-action, a term coined by physicist Karen Barad. From this interrogation of dichotomies and the notion of intra-action follow further conceptual shifts that are discussed as productive for the future of HCI, namely responsibility as specification of ethical agency and performativity in contrast to representationalism.
@inproceedings{draude2020boundaries, abstract = {We live in a world that is increasingly shaped through computational technology. The expansion and pervasiveness of computing brings along opportunities and challenges for the field of HCI. New application domains evolve and technological advances pose novel interaction possibilities. But with computing's shaping power comes also the need for increased responsibility and attention to the societal, political and ecological impact of technology. In this conceptual paper, new materialist thinking is employed to locate these societal etc. aspects as inextricably enmeshed within computing research and development. New materialism is a multi-vocal, cross-disciplinary field of doing-thinking. In contrast to Western dichotomic tradition, a monistic, post-anthropocentric perspective is provided and matter as an active agent in world-making is acknowledged. Central to this paper is the questioning of the human and computer dichotomy at the core of the field of HCI. For this, a material-semiotic perspective on human-computer interaction is elaborated upon. Furthermore, the paradigm of interaction is revisited and reworked as a conception of agential intra-action, a term coined by physicist Karen Barad. From this interrogation of dichotomies and the notion of intra-action follow further conceptual shifts that are discussed as productive for the future of HCI, namely responsibility as specification of ethical agency and performativity in contrast to representationalism.}, address = {Copenhagen, Denmark}, author = {Draude, Claude}, booktitle = {Human-Computer Interaction. Design and User Experience}, editor = {Kurosu, Masaaki}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {20-32}, publisher = {Springer International Publishing}, series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science}, title = {"Boundaries Do Not Sit Still" from Interaction to Agential Intra-action in HCI}, volume = 12181, year = 2020 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 draude2020boundaries %A Draude, Claude %B Human-Computer Interaction. Design and User Experience %C Copenhagen, Denmark %D 2020 %E Kurosu, Masaaki %I Springer International Publishing %P 20-32 %R 10.1007/978-3-030-49059-1_2 %T "Boundaries Do Not Sit Still" from Interaction to Agential Intra-action in HCI %V 12181 %X We live in a world that is increasingly shaped through computational technology. The expansion and pervasiveness of computing brings along opportunities and challenges for the field of HCI. New application domains evolve and technological advances pose novel interaction possibilities. But with computing's shaping power comes also the need for increased responsibility and attention to the societal, political and ecological impact of technology. In this conceptual paper, new materialist thinking is employed to locate these societal etc. aspects as inextricably enmeshed within computing research and development. New materialism is a multi-vocal, cross-disciplinary field of doing-thinking. In contrast to Western dichotomic tradition, a monistic, post-anthropocentric perspective is provided and matter as an active agent in world-making is acknowledged. Central to this paper is the questioning of the human and computer dichotomy at the core of the field of HCI. For this, a material-semiotic perspective on human-computer interaction is elaborated upon. Furthermore, the paradigm of interaction is revisited and reworked as a conception of agential intra-action, a term coined by physicist Karen Barad. From this interrogation of dichotomies and the notion of intra-action follow further conceptual shifts that are discussed as productive for the future of HCI, namely responsibility as specification of ethical agency and performativity in contrast to representationalism. %@ 978-3-030-49059-1
Draude, C. (2020). "...but how do you formalize it?" - Gender Studies als konstruktive Intervention in der Informatik. In T. Bieling (Ed.), Gender (&) Design. Positionen Zur Vergeschlechtlichung in Gestaltungskulturen (Vols 2). MIMESIS EDIZIONI.
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
@incollection{draude2020formalize, author = {Draude, Claude}, booktitle = {Gender (&) Design. Positionen Zur Vergeschlechtlichung in Gestaltungskulturen}, editor = {Bieling, Tom}, keywords = {itegpub}, publisher = {MIMESIS EDIZIONI}, series = {Design Meanings}, title = {"...but how do you formalize it?" - Gender Studies als konstruktive Intervention in der Informatik}, volume = 2, year = 2020 }
%0 Book Section %1 draude2020formalize %A Draude, Claude %B Gender (&) Design. Positionen Zur Vergeschlechtlichung in Gestaltungskulturen %D 2020 %E Bieling, Tom %I MIMESIS EDIZIONI %T "...but how do you formalize it?" - Gender Studies als konstruktive Intervention in der Informatik %V 2 %@ 9788869772429
Draude, C., Klumbytė, G., Lücking, P., & Treusch, P. (2020). Situated algorithms: a sociotechnical systemic approach to bias. Online Information Review, 44(2), 325-342. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2018-0332
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
@article{draude2020situated, author = {Draude, Claude and Klumbytė, Goda and Lücking, Phillip and Treusch, Pat}, journal = {Online Information Review}, keywords = {itegpub}, number = 2, pages = {325-342}, title = {Situated algorithms: a sociotechnical systemic approach to bias}, volume = 44, year = 2020 }
%0 Journal Article %1 draude2020situated %A Draude, Claude %A Klumbytė, Goda %A Lücking, Phillip %A Treusch, Pat %D 2020 %J Online Information Review %N 2 %P 325-342 %R 10.1108/OIR-10-2018-0332 %T Situated algorithms: a sociotechnical systemic approach to bias %V 44
Klumbytė, G., & Britton, L. (2020). Said the Bot to the Computer: 57th collected significant residue transmission between MIT and SliMoSA3. Arts of the Working Class, 120, 26-27. http://artsoftheworkingclass.org/text/said-the-bot-to-the-computer
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
@article{klumbyte2020computer, author = {Klumbytė, Goda and Britton, Loren}, journal = {Arts of the Working Class}, keywords = {itegpub}, number = 120, pages = {26-27}, series = {The New Serenity}, title = {Said the Bot to the Computer: 57th collected significant residue transmission between MIT and SliMoSA3}, year = 2020 }
%0 Journal Article %1 klumbyte2020computer %A Klumbytė, Goda %A Britton, Loren %B The New Serenity %D 2020 %J Arts of the Working Class %N 120 %P 26-27 %T Said the Bot to the Computer: 57th collected significant residue transmission between MIT and SliMoSA3 %U http://artsoftheworkingclass.org/text/said-the-bot-to-the-computer
Klumbytė, G., & Britton, L. (2020). Abstracting Otherwise: In Search for a Common Strategy of Arts and Computing. ASAP/Journal, 5(1), 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1353/asa.2020.0001
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
@article{Klumbyte_2020, author = {Klumbytė, Goda and Britton, Loren}, journal = {ASAP/Journal}, keywords = {itegpub}, number = 1, pages = {19-43}, publisher = {Project Muse}, title = {Abstracting Otherwise: In Search for a Common Strategy of Arts and Computing}, volume = 5, year = 2020 }
%0 Journal Article %1 Klumbyte_2020 %A Klumbytė, Goda %A Britton, Loren %D 2020 %I Project Muse %J ASAP/Journal %N 1 %P 19-43 %R 10.1353/asa.2020.0001 %T Abstracting Otherwise: In Search for a Common Strategy of Arts and Computing %U https://doi.org/10.1353%2Fasa.2020.0001 %V 5
Klumbytė, G., Draude, C., & Britton, L. (2020). Re-Imagining HCI: New Materialist Philosophy and Figurations as Tool for Design. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.02312
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
In this paper we interrogate the practices of imagining in human-computer interaction (HCI), particularly in scenario building (SBE) and persona construction. We discuss the philosophical premises of HCI imaginings in rationalism, cognitivism and phenomenology, and we propose (feminist) new materialist philosophy as an enriching perspective that helps generate a holistic, relational perspective of users, imaginaries and technologies. In the end we explore the method of figurations as a potential tool for HCI design.
@misc{klumbyte2020reimagining, abstract = {In this paper we interrogate the practices of imagining in human-computer interaction (HCI), particularly in scenario building (SBE) and persona construction. We discuss the philosophical premises of HCI imaginings in rationalism, cognitivism and phenomenology, and we propose (feminist) new materialist philosophy as an enriching perspective that helps generate a holistic, relational perspective of users, imaginaries and technologies. In the end we explore the method of figurations as a potential tool for HCI design.}, author = {Klumbytė, Goda and Draude, Claude and Britton, Loren}, keywords = {itegpub}, title = {Re-Imagining HCI: New Materialist Philosophy and Figurations as Tool for Design}, year = 2020 }
%0 Generic %1 klumbyte2020reimagining %A Klumbytė, Goda %A Draude, Claude %A Britton, Loren %D 2020 %T Re-Imagining HCI: New Materialist Philosophy and Figurations as Tool for Design %U https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.02312 %X In this paper we interrogate the practices of imagining in human-computer interaction (HCI), particularly in scenario building (SBE) and persona construction. We discuss the philosophical premises of HCI imaginings in rationalism, cognitivism and phenomenology, and we propose (feminist) new materialist philosophy as an enriching perspective that helps generate a holistic, relational perspective of users, imaginaries and technologies. In the end we explore the method of figurations as a potential tool for HCI design.
Klumbytė, G., Lücking, P., & Draude, C. (2020). Reframing AX with Critical Design: The Potentials and Limits of Algorithmic Experience as a Critical Design Concept. Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society, 67, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420120
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
This paper investigates how Algorithmic Experience (AX) can be used as a conceptual tool to help make algorithms and experiences of them visible through systems design and how interactions might be designed in order to elicit conscious and critical examination. Can algorithmic systems be positioned as critical artifacts? If so, to what extent? The paper reflects on interactions between users and the Social Privilege Estimator– a social scoring system based on facial recognition and classification that was built as a critical design artifact in order to raise awareness of existing inequalities and adverse effects of facial recognition systems. We argue that critical design can and should be used for AX and human-algorithm interaction design in order to support algorithmic literacy and critical capacity of the users and we suggest some conceptual reframings of AX towards this goal.
@inproceedings{10.1145/3419249.3420120, abstract = {This paper investigates how Algorithmic Experience (AX) can be used as a conceptual tool to help make algorithms and experiences of them visible through systems design and how interactions might be designed in order to elicit conscious and critical examination. Can algorithmic systems be positioned as critical artifacts? If so, to what extent? The paper reflects on interactions between users and the Social Privilege Estimator– a social scoring system based on facial recognition and classification that was built as a critical design artifact in order to raise awareness of existing inequalities and adverse effects of facial recognition systems. We argue that critical design can and should be used for AX and human-algorithm interaction design in order to support algorithmic literacy and critical capacity of the users and we suggest some conceptual reframings of AX towards this goal.}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, author = {Klumbytė, Goda and Lücking, Phillip and Draude, Claude}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society}, keywords = {social_privilege}, number = 67, pages = {1-12}, publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery}, series = {NordiCHI '20}, title = {Reframing AX with Critical Design: The Potentials and Limits of Algorithmic Experience as a Critical Design Concept}, year = 2020 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 10.1145/3419249.3420120 %A Klumbytė, Goda %A Lücking, Phillip %A Draude, Claude %B Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society %C New York, NY, USA %D 2020 %I Association for Computing Machinery %N 67 %P 1-12 %R 10.1145/3419249.3420120 %T Reframing AX with Critical Design: The Potentials and Limits of Algorithmic Experience as a Critical Design Concept %U https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420120 %X This paper investigates how Algorithmic Experience (AX) can be used as a conceptual tool to help make algorithms and experiences of them visible through systems design and how interactions might be designed in order to elicit conscious and critical examination. Can algorithmic systems be positioned as critical artifacts? If so, to what extent? The paper reflects on interactions between users and the Social Privilege Estimator– a social scoring system based on facial recognition and classification that was built as a critical design artifact in order to raise awareness of existing inequalities and adverse effects of facial recognition systems. We argue that critical design can and should be used for AX and human-algorithm interaction design in order to support algorithmic literacy and critical capacity of the users and we suggest some conceptual reframings of AX towards this goal. %@ 9781450375795
Klumbyte, G., Lücking, P., & Draude, C. (2020). Reframing AX with Critical Design: The Potentials and Limits of Algorithmic Experience as a Critical Design Concept. Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420120
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
This paper investigates how Algorithmic Experience (AX) can be used as a conceptual tool to help make algorithms and experiences of them visible through systems design and how interactions might be designed in order to elicit conscious and critical examination. Can algorithmic systems be positioned as critical artifacts? If so, to what extent? The paper reflects on interactions between users and the Social Privilege Estimator– a social scoring system based on facial recognition and classification that was built as a critical design artifact in order to raise awareness of existing inequalities and adverse effects of facial recognition systems. We argue that critical design can and should be used for AX and human-algorithm interaction design in order to support algorithmic literacy and critical capacity of the users and we suggest some conceptual reframings of AX towards this goal.
@inproceedings{10.1145/3419249.3420120, abstract = {This paper investigates how Algorithmic Experience (AX) can be used as a conceptual tool to help make algorithms and experiences of them visible through systems design and how interactions might be designed in order to elicit conscious and critical examination. Can algorithmic systems be positioned as critical artifacts? If so, to what extent? The paper reflects on interactions between users and the Social Privilege Estimator– a social scoring system based on facial recognition and classification that was built as a critical design artifact in order to raise awareness of existing inequalities and adverse effects of facial recognition systems. We argue that critical design can and should be used for AX and human-algorithm interaction design in order to support algorithmic literacy and critical capacity of the users and we suggest some conceptual reframings of AX towards this goal.}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, author = {Klumbyte, Goda and Lücking, Phillip and Draude, Claude}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society}, keywords = {myown}, publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery}, series = {NordiCHI '20}, title = {Reframing AX with Critical Design: The Potentials and Limits of Algorithmic Experience as a Critical Design Concept}, year = 2020 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 10.1145/3419249.3420120 %A Klumbyte, Goda %A Lücking, Phillip %A Draude, Claude %B Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society %C New York, NY, USA %D 2020 %I Association for Computing Machinery %R 10.1145/3419249.3420120 %T Reframing AX with Critical Design: The Potentials and Limits of Algorithmic Experience as a Critical Design Concept %U https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420120 %X This paper investigates how Algorithmic Experience (AX) can be used as a conceptual tool to help make algorithms and experiences of them visible through systems design and how interactions might be designed in order to elicit conscious and critical examination. Can algorithmic systems be positioned as critical artifacts? If so, to what extent? The paper reflects on interactions between users and the Social Privilege Estimator– a social scoring system based on facial recognition and classification that was built as a critical design artifact in order to raise awareness of existing inequalities and adverse effects of facial recognition systems. We argue that critical design can and should be used for AX and human-algorithm interaction design in order to support algorithmic literacy and critical capacity of the users and we suggest some conceptual reframings of AX towards this goal. %@ 9781450375795
Lücking, P. (2020). Automatisierte Ungleichheit - Wie algorithmische Entscheidungssysteme gesellschaftliche Machtverhältnisse (re)produzieren. In netzforma e.V. (Ed.), Wenn KI, dann feministisch (pp. 65-76). https://netzforma.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/2020_wenn-ki-dann-feministisch_netzforma.pdf
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
@inbook{lucking2020automatisierte, address = {Berlin}, author = {Lücking, Phillip}, booktitle = {Wenn KI, dann feministisch}, editor = {netzforma e.V.}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {65-76}, title = {Automatisierte Ungleichheit - Wie algorithmische Entscheidungssysteme gesellschaftliche Machtverhältnisse (re)produzieren}, year = 2020 }
%0 Book Section %1 lucking2020automatisierte %A Lücking, Phillip %B Wenn KI, dann feministisch %C Berlin %D 2020 %E netzforma e.V., %P 65-76 %T Automatisierte Ungleichheit - Wie algorithmische Entscheidungssysteme gesellschaftliche Machtverhältnisse (re)produzieren %U https://netzforma.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/2020_wenn-ki-dann-feministisch_netzforma.pdf
Wan, E., de Groot, A., Jameson, S., Păun, M., Lücking, P., Klumbytė, G., & Lämmerhirt, D. (2020). Lost in Translation: An Interactive Workshop Mapping Interdisciplinary Translations for Epistemic Justice. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 692. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3375685
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
There are gaps in understanding in and between those who design systems of AI/ ML, those who critique them, and those positioned between these discourses. This gap can be defined in multiple ways - e.g. methodological, epistemological, linguistic, or cultural. To bridge this gap requires a set of translations: the generation of a collaborative space and a new set of shared sensibilities that traverse disciplinary boundaries. This workshop aims to explore translations across multiple fields, and translations between theory and practice, as well as how interdisciplinary work could generate new operationalizable approaches. We define 'knowledge' as a social product (L. Code) which requires fair and broad epistemic cooperation in its generation, development, and dissemination. As a "marker for truth" (B. Williams) and therefore a basis for action, knowledge circulation sustains the systems of power which produce it in the first place (M. Foucault). Enabled by epistemic credence, authority or knowledge, epistemic power can be an important driver of, but also result from, other (e.g. economic, political) powers. To produce reliable output, our standards and methods should serve us all and exclude no-one. Critical theorists have long revealed failings of epistemic practices, resulting in the marginalization and exclusion of some types of knowledge. How can we cultivate more reflexive epistemic practices in the interdisciplinary research setting of FAT*? We frame this ideal as 'epistemic justice' (M. Geuskens), the positive of 'epistemic injustice', defined by M. Fricker as injustice that exists when people are wronged as a knower or as an epistemic subject. Epistemic justice is the proper use and allocation of epistemic power; the inclusion and balancing of all epistemic sources. As S. Jasanoff reminds us, any authoritative way of seeing must be legitimized in discourse and practice, showing that practices can be developed to value and engage with other viewpoints and possibly reshape our ways of knowing. Our workshop aims to address the following questions: how could critical theory or higher level critiques be translated into and anchored in ML/AI design practices - and vice versa? What kind of cartographies and methodologies are needed in order to identify issues that can act as the basis of collaborative research and design? How can we (un)learn our established ways of thinking for such collaborative work to take place? During the workshop, participants will create, share and explode prototypical workflows of designing, researching and critiquing algorithmic systems. We will identify moments in which translations and interdisciplinary interventions could or should happen in order to build actionable steps and methodological frameworks that advance epistemic justice and are conducive to future interdisciplinary collaboration.
@inproceedings{10.1145/3351095.3375685, abstract = {There are gaps in understanding in and between those who design systems of AI/ ML, those who critique them, and those positioned between these discourses. This gap can be defined in multiple ways - e.g. methodological, epistemological, linguistic, or cultural. To bridge this gap requires a set of translations: the generation of a collaborative space and a new set of shared sensibilities that traverse disciplinary boundaries. This workshop aims to explore translations across multiple fields, and translations between theory and practice, as well as how interdisciplinary work could generate new operationalizable approaches. We define 'knowledge' as a social product (L. Code) which requires fair and broad epistemic cooperation in its generation, development, and dissemination. As a "marker for truth" (B. Williams) and therefore a basis for action, knowledge circulation sustains the systems of power which produce it in the first place (M. Foucault). Enabled by epistemic credence, authority or knowledge, epistemic power can be an important driver of, but also result from, other (e.g. economic, political) powers. To produce reliable output, our standards and methods should serve us all and exclude no-one. Critical theorists have long revealed failings of epistemic practices, resulting in the marginalization and exclusion of some types of knowledge. How can we cultivate more reflexive epistemic practices in the interdisciplinary research setting of FAT*? We frame this ideal as 'epistemic justice' (M. Geuskens), the positive of 'epistemic injustice', defined by M. Fricker as injustice that exists when people are wronged as a knower or as an epistemic subject. Epistemic justice is the proper use and allocation of epistemic power; the inclusion and balancing of all epistemic sources. As S. Jasanoff reminds us, any authoritative way of seeing must be legitimized in discourse and practice, showing that practices can be developed to value and engage with other viewpoints and possibly reshape our ways of knowing. Our workshop aims to address the following questions: how could critical theory or higher level critiques be translated into and anchored in ML/AI design practices - and vice versa? What kind of cartographies and methodologies are needed in order to identify issues that can act as the basis of collaborative research and design? How can we (un)learn our established ways of thinking for such collaborative work to take place? During the workshop, participants will create, share and explode prototypical workflows of designing, researching and critiquing algorithmic systems. We will identify moments in which translations and interdisciplinary interventions could or should happen in order to build actionable steps and methodological frameworks that advance epistemic justice and are conducive to future interdisciplinary collaboration.}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, author = {Wan, Evelyn and de Groot, Aviva and Jameson, Shazade and Păun, Mara and Lücking, Phillip and Klumbytė, Goda and Lämmerhirt, Danny}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency}, keywords = {workflow}, pages = 692, publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery}, series = {FAT* ’20}, title = {Lost in Translation: An Interactive Workshop Mapping Interdisciplinary Translations for Epistemic Justice}, year = 2020 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 10.1145/3351095.3375685 %A Wan, Evelyn %A de Groot, Aviva %A Jameson, Shazade %A Păun, Mara %A Lücking, Phillip %A Klumbytė, Goda %A Lämmerhirt, Danny %B Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency %C New York, NY, USA %D 2020 %I Association for Computing Machinery %P 692 %R 10.1145/3351095.3375685 %T Lost in Translation: An Interactive Workshop Mapping Interdisciplinary Translations for Epistemic Justice %U https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3375685 %X There are gaps in understanding in and between those who design systems of AI/ ML, those who critique them, and those positioned between these discourses. This gap can be defined in multiple ways - e.g. methodological, epistemological, linguistic, or cultural. To bridge this gap requires a set of translations: the generation of a collaborative space and a new set of shared sensibilities that traverse disciplinary boundaries. This workshop aims to explore translations across multiple fields, and translations between theory and practice, as well as how interdisciplinary work could generate new operationalizable approaches. We define 'knowledge' as a social product (L. Code) which requires fair and broad epistemic cooperation in its generation, development, and dissemination. As a "marker for truth" (B. Williams) and therefore a basis for action, knowledge circulation sustains the systems of power which produce it in the first place (M. Foucault). Enabled by epistemic credence, authority or knowledge, epistemic power can be an important driver of, but also result from, other (e.g. economic, political) powers. To produce reliable output, our standards and methods should serve us all and exclude no-one. Critical theorists have long revealed failings of epistemic practices, resulting in the marginalization and exclusion of some types of knowledge. How can we cultivate more reflexive epistemic practices in the interdisciplinary research setting of FAT*? We frame this ideal as 'epistemic justice' (M. Geuskens), the positive of 'epistemic injustice', defined by M. Fricker as injustice that exists when people are wronged as a knower or as an epistemic subject. Epistemic justice is the proper use and allocation of epistemic power; the inclusion and balancing of all epistemic sources. As S. Jasanoff reminds us, any authoritative way of seeing must be legitimized in discourse and practice, showing that practices can be developed to value and engage with other viewpoints and possibly reshape our ways of knowing. Our workshop aims to address the following questions: how could critical theory or higher level critiques be translated into and anchored in ML/AI design practices - and vice versa? What kind of cartographies and methodologies are needed in order to identify issues that can act as the basis of collaborative research and design? How can we (un)learn our established ways of thinking for such collaborative work to take place? During the workshop, participants will create, share and explode prototypical workflows of designing, researching and critiquing algorithmic systems. We will identify moments in which translations and interdisciplinary interventions could or should happen in order to build actionable steps and methodological frameworks that advance epistemic justice and are conducive to future interdisciplinary collaboration. %@ 9781450369367

2019[ to top ]

Britton, L., Klumbyte, G., & Draude, C. (2019). Doing thinking: revisiting computing with artistic research and technofeminism. Digital Creativity, 30(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2019.1684322
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
@article{brittondoing, author = {Britton, Loren and Klumbyte, Goda and Draude, Claude}, journal = {Digital Creativity}, keywords = {technofeminism}, number = 4, pages = {1-16}, title = {Doing thinking: revisiting computing with artistic research and technofeminism}, volume = 30, year = 2019 }
%0 Journal Article %1 brittondoing %A Britton, Loren %A Klumbyte, Goda %A Draude, Claude %D 2019 %J Digital Creativity %N 4 %P 1-16 %R 10.1080/14626268.2019.1684322 %T Doing thinking: revisiting computing with artistic research and technofeminism %V 30
Dankwa, N. K. (2019). Participatory Design of Smart Home Technology: self-reflections of my work as a black African migrant HCI researcher. GenderIT.Org. https://genderit.org/feminist-talk/participatory-design-smart-home-technology-self-reflections-my-work-black-african
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
@article{dankwa2019participatory, author = {Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa}, journal = {GenderIT.org}, keywords = {smartHome}, title = {Participatory Design of Smart Home Technology: self-reflections of my work as a black African migrant HCI researcher}, year = 2019 }
%0 Journal Article %1 dankwa2019participatory %A Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa %D 2019 %J GenderIT.org %T Participatory Design of Smart Home Technology: self-reflections of my work as a black African migrant HCI researcher %U https://genderit.org/feminist-talk/participatory-design-smart-home-technology-self-reflections-my-work-black-african
Dankwa, N. K. (2019). Participatory Design Of Smart Home Technology: Self-Reflections Of My Work As A Black African Migrant HCI Researcher (GenderIT.org, Ed.). https://genderit.org/feminist-talk/participatory-design-smart-home-technology-self-reflections-my-work-black-african
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
@electronic{dankwa2019participatory, author = {Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa}, editor = {GenderIT.org}, keywords = {smarthome}, title = {Participatory Design Of Smart Home Technology: Self-Reflections Of My Work As A Black African Migrant HCI Researcher}, year = 2019 }
%0 Generic %1 dankwa2019participatory %A Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa %D 2019 %E GenderIT.org, %T Participatory Design Of Smart Home Technology: Self-Reflections Of My Work As A Black African Migrant HCI Researcher %U https://genderit.org/feminist-talk/participatory-design-smart-home-technology-self-reflections-my-work-black-african
Dankwa, N. K. (2019). Offline or online. Mine!. In K. Mosene & M. C. Kettemann (Eds.), Many Worlds. Many Nets. Many Visions. Critical Voices, Visions and Vectors for Internet Governance. (p. 25). Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG) and Leibniz Institute for Media Research / Hans-Bredow Institut (HBI). https://www.hiig.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/IGF-Statements-Critical-Voices-WEB.pdf
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
@incollection{dankwa2019offline, author = {Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa}, booktitle = {Many Worlds. Many Nets. Many Visions. Critical Voices, Visions and Vectors for Internet Governance.}, editor = {Mosene, Katharina and Kettemann, Matthias C.}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = 25, publisher = {Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG) and Leibniz Institute for Media Research / Hans-Bredow Institut (HBI)}, series = {Internet Governance Forum Berlin 2019}, title = {Offline or online. Mine!}, year = 2019 }
%0 Book Section %1 dankwa2019offline %A Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa %B Many Worlds. Many Nets. Many Visions. Critical Voices, Visions and Vectors for Internet Governance. %D 2019 %E Mosene, Katharina %E Kettemann, Matthias C. %I Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG) and Leibniz Institute for Media Research / Hans-Bredow Institut (HBI) %P 25 %T Offline or online. Mine! %U https://www.hiig.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/IGF-Statements-Critical-Voices-WEB.pdf
Draude, C. (2019). Non-discrimination by design?!. In K. Mosene & M. C. Kettemann (Eds.), Many Worlds. Many Nets. Many Visions. Critical Voices, Visions and Vectors for Internet Governance. (p. 34). Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG) and Leibniz Institute for Media Research / Hans-Bredow Institut (HBI). https://www.hiig.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/IGF-Statements-Critical-Voices-WEB.pdf
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
@incollection{draude2019nondiscrimination, author = {Draude, Claude}, booktitle = {Many Worlds. Many Nets. Many Visions. Critical Voices, Visions and Vectors for Internet Governance.}, editor = {Mosene, Katharina and Kettemann, Matthias C.}, keywords = {participatorydesign}, pages = 34, publisher = {Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG) and Leibniz Institute for Media Research / Hans-Bredow Institut (HBI)}, series = {Internet Governance Forum Berlin 2019}, title = {Non-discrimination by design?!}, year = 2019 }
%0 Book Section %1 draude2019nondiscrimination %A Draude, Claude %B Many Worlds. Many Nets. Many Visions. Critical Voices, Visions and Vectors for Internet Governance. %D 2019 %E Mosene, Katharina %E Kettemann, Matthias C. %I Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG) and Leibniz Institute for Media Research / Hans-Bredow Institut (HBI) %P 34 %T Non-discrimination by design?! %U https://www.hiig.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/IGF-Statements-Critical-Voices-WEB.pdf
Draude, C. (2019). “Everything will be screen.” Readdressing Screenness through Art-based Experiments. In H. Borgdorff, P. Peters, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Dialogues Between Artistic Research and Science and Technology Studies (pp. 139-154). London/New York: Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Dialogues-Between-Artistic-Research-and-Science-and-Technology-Studies/Borgdorff-Peters-Pinch/p/book/9781138343856
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
@incollection{draude2019everything, author = {Draude, Claude}, booktitle = {Dialogues Between Artistic Research and Science and Technology Studies}, editor = {Borgdorff, Henk and Peters, Peter and Pinch, Trevor}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {139-154}, publisher = {London/New York: Routledge}, title = {“Everything will be screen.” Readdressing Screenness through Art-based Experiments}, year = 2019 }
%0 Book Section %1 draude2019everything %A Draude, Claude %B Dialogues Between Artistic Research and Science and Technology Studies %D 2019 %E Borgdorff, Henk %E Peters, Peter %E Pinch, Trevor %I London/New York: Routledge %P 139-154 %T “Everything will be screen.” Readdressing Screenness through Art-based Experiments %U https://www.routledge.com/Dialogues-Between-Artistic-Research-and-Science-and-Technology-Studies/Borgdorff-Peters-Pinch/p/book/9781138343856 %@ 9781138343856
Draude, C., Klumbyte, G., Lücking, P., & Treusch, P. (2019). Situated algorithms: a sociotechnical systemic approach to bias. OIR (Online Information Review), ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 16-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2018-0332
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ DOI ]
@article{draude, author = {Draude, Claude and Klumbyte, Goda and Lücking, Phillip and Treusch, Pat}, journal = {OIR (Online Information Review)}, keywords = {myown}, number = {ahead-of-print}, pages = {16-34}, title = {Situated algorithms: a sociotechnical systemic approach to bias}, volume = {ahead-of-print}, year = 2019 }
%0 Journal Article %1 draude %A Draude, Claude %A Klumbyte, Goda %A Lücking, Phillip %A Treusch, Pat %D 2019 %J OIR (Online Information Review) %N ahead-of-print %P 16-34 %R 10.1108/OIR-10-2018-0332 %T Situated algorithms: a sociotechnical systemic approach to bias %V ahead-of-print
Draude, C., Lange, M., & Sick, B. (2019). INFORMATIK 2019: 50 Jahre Gesellschaft für Informatik – Informatik für Gesellschaft (Workshop-Beiträge). In LNI P-295. Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
@proceedings{draude2019informatik, address = {Bonn}, author = {Draude, Claude and Lange, Martin and Sick, Bernhard}, keywords = {itegpub}, publisher = {Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.}, series = {LNI P-295}, title = {INFORMATIK 2019: 50 Jahre Gesellschaft für Informatik – Informatik für Gesellschaft (Workshop-Beiträge)}, year = 2019 }
%0 Conference Proceedings %1 draude2019informatik %A Draude, Claude %A Lange, Martin %A Sick, Bernhard %B LNI P-295 %C Bonn %D 2019 %I Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. %T INFORMATIK 2019: 50 Jahre Gesellschaft für Informatik – Informatik für Gesellschaft (Workshop-Beiträge) %@ 978-3-88579-689-3
Mangelsdorf, M., & Draude, C. (2019). Gender in MINT unterrichten – Hochschuldidaktische Ansätze. In M. Mangelsdorf (Ed.), Handreichung Gendering MINT. Vernetzung und Austausch von Gender-Perspektiven in den Natur- und Technikwissenschaften (pp. 61-81). Universität Freiburg, Förderung Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung, Förderkennzeichen 01FP1453. https://www.genderingmint.uni-freiburg.de/index.php/archiv/info
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
@incollection{mangelsdorf2019gender, author = {Mangelsdorf, Marion and Draude, Claude}, booktitle = {Handreichung Gendering MINT. Vernetzung und Austausch von Gender-Perspektiven in den Natur- und Technikwissenschaften}, editor = {Mangelsdorf, Marion}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {61-81}, publisher = {Universität Freiburg, Förderung Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung, Förderkennzeichen 01FP1453}, title = {Gender in MINT unterrichten – Hochschuldidaktische Ansätze}, year = 2019 }
%0 Book Section %1 mangelsdorf2019gender %A Mangelsdorf, Marion %A Draude, Claude %B Handreichung Gendering MINT. Vernetzung und Austausch von Gender-Perspektiven in den Natur- und Technikwissenschaften %D 2019 %E Mangelsdorf, Marion %I Universität Freiburg, Förderung Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung, Förderkennzeichen 01FP1453 %P 61-81 %T Gender in MINT unterrichten – Hochschuldidaktische Ansätze %U https://www.genderingmint.uni-freiburg.de/index.php/archiv/info
Weidner, C., Braidotti, R., & Klumbyte, G. (2019). The Emergent Environmental Humanities: Engineering the Social Imaginary. Connotations - A Journal for Critical Debate, ISSN 0939-5482(28), p. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.25623/conn28-weidner-et-al-1
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
If the Environmental Humanities (EH) matter, an essential concern is whether we can speak of the possibility of a philosopher of literary and ecological identity. This paper discusses the intersection points of the Environmental Humanities to the wider scientific debate. It suggests that the EH are suited to help construct knowledge for sustainable futures. The arrival of the Anthropocene provides opportunities to cross disciplinary boundaries. Ecocriticism investigates the complex and contradictory relationship between humans and the environment in literature. Ideas of citizenship allow space for conversation about civic responsibility and stewardship. Animal studies intervenes deeply across the humanities, which acknowledges the interspecies imaginary. Future techno-scientific developments make us reconsider distinctions between humans, animals, and machines. The concept of the posthuman emphasizes how profound changes will be for all species. Serious questions might best be answered by environmental philosophy, which articulates the impact of the environment on humans. New Materialism explains why matter matters, and has clear implications for the study of the environment. Work in postcolonial and digital media provides a platform to challenge geographic borders as well as reconsider national contexts. Essentially, this paper asserts that the EH is building critical mass, and functions as a lightning rod between the arts and sciences. Such a development has profound consequences for the future of literary studies.
@article{https://doi.org/10.25623/conn28-weidner-et-al-1, abstract = {If the Environmental Humanities (EH) matter, an essential concern is whether we can speak of the possibility of a philosopher of literary and ecological identity. This paper discusses the intersection points of the Environmental Humanities to the wider scientific debate. It suggests that the EH are suited to help construct knowledge for sustainable futures. The arrival of the Anthropocene provides opportunities to cross disciplinary boundaries. Ecocriticism investigates the complex and contradictory relationship between humans and the environment in literature. Ideas of citizenship allow space for conversation about civic responsibility and stewardship. Animal studies intervenes deeply across the humanities, which acknowledges the interspecies imaginary. Future techno-scientific developments make us reconsider distinctions between humans, animals, and machines. The concept of the posthuman emphasizes how profound changes will be for all species. Serious questions might best be answered by environmental philosophy, which articulates the impact of the environment on humans. New Materialism explains why matter matters, and has clear implications for the study of the environment. Work in postcolonial and digital media provides a platform to challenge geographic borders as well as reconsider national contexts. Essentially, this paper asserts that the EH is building critical mass, and functions as a lightning rod between the arts and sciences. Such a development has profound consequences for the future of literary studies.}, author = {Weidner, Chad and Braidotti, Rosi and Klumbyte, Goda}, journal = {Connotations - A Journal for Critical Debate}, keywords = {myown}, number = 28, pages = {p. 1-25}, publisher = {Connotations Society}, title = {The Emergent Environmental Humanities: Engineering the Social Imaginary}, volume = {ISSN 0939-5482}, year = 2019 }
%0 Journal Article %1 https://doi.org/10.25623/conn28-weidner-et-al-1 %A Weidner, Chad %A Braidotti, Rosi %A Klumbyte, Goda %D 2019 %I Connotations Society %J Connotations - A Journal for Critical Debate %N 28 %P p. 1-25 %R 10.25623/conn28-weidner-et-al-1 %T The Emergent Environmental Humanities: Engineering the Social Imaginary %U http://www.es-repo.uni-tuebingen.de/stable/connotations/weidner-braidotti-klumbyte028.pdf %V ISSN 0939-5482 %X If the Environmental Humanities (EH) matter, an essential concern is whether we can speak of the possibility of a philosopher of literary and ecological identity. This paper discusses the intersection points of the Environmental Humanities to the wider scientific debate. It suggests that the EH are suited to help construct knowledge for sustainable futures. The arrival of the Anthropocene provides opportunities to cross disciplinary boundaries. Ecocriticism investigates the complex and contradictory relationship between humans and the environment in literature. Ideas of citizenship allow space for conversation about civic responsibility and stewardship. Animal studies intervenes deeply across the humanities, which acknowledges the interspecies imaginary. Future techno-scientific developments make us reconsider distinctions between humans, animals, and machines. The concept of the posthuman emphasizes how profound changes will be for all species. Serious questions might best be answered by environmental philosophy, which articulates the impact of the environment on humans. New Materialism explains why matter matters, and has clear implications for the study of the environment. Work in postcolonial and digital media provides a platform to challenge geographic borders as well as reconsider national contexts. Essentially, this paper asserts that the EH is building critical mass, and functions as a lightning rod between the arts and sciences. Such a development has profound consequences for the future of literary studies.
Zuendorf, A., Copei, S., Diethelm, I., Draude, C., Kunz, A., & Norbisrath, U. (2019). Explaining Business Process Software with Fulib-Scenarios. Workshop proceedings of the 34th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2019).
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
@inproceedings{zuendorf2019explaining, author = {Zuendorf, Albert and Copei, Sebastian and Diethelm, Ira and Draude, Claude and Kunz, Adrian and Norbisrath, Ulrich}, keywords = {softwareengineering}, title = {Explaining Business Process Software with Fulib-Scenarios}, volume = {Workshop proceedings of the 34th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2019)}, year = 2019 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 zuendorf2019explaining %A Zuendorf, Albert %A Copei, Sebastian %A Diethelm, Ira %A Draude, Claude %A Kunz, Adrian %A Norbisrath, Ulrich %D 2019 %T Explaining Business Process Software with Fulib-Scenarios %V Workshop proceedings of the 34th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2019)

2018[ to top ]

Bläsing, L. M., & Götschel, H. (2018). Das Fachgebiet Gender MINT an der Hochschule Hannover. Lehrangebot für vielfältige Studierendengruppen wahrnehmbar attraktiver gestalten. Die Ingenieurin, 125(2), 11-14.
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
@article{blasing2018fachgebiet, author = {Bläsing, L. M. and Götschel, H}, journal = {Die Ingenieurin}, keywords = {itegpub}, number = 2, pages = {11-14}, title = {Das Fachgebiet Gender MINT an der Hochschule Hannover. Lehrangebot für vielfältige Studierendengruppen wahrnehmbar attraktiver gestalten}, volume = 125, year = 2018 }
%0 Journal Article %1 blasing2018fachgebiet %A Bläsing, L. M. %A Götschel, H %D 2018 %J Die Ingenieurin %N 2 %P 11-14 %T Das Fachgebiet Gender MINT an der Hochschule Hannover. Lehrangebot für vielfältige Studierendengruppen wahrnehmbar attraktiver gestalten %V 125
Dankwa, N. K. (2018). Driving smart home innovation with the gender dimension. Feminist Voices in Technology, 1(ISS001), 9-10. http://www.fvt-pp.uk/smartHomeGenderDimension.html
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
@article{dankwa2018driving, author = {Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa}, journal = {Feminist Voices in Technology}, keywords = {smarthome}, month = {November}, number = {ISS001}, pages = {9-10}, title = {Driving smart home innovation with the gender dimension}, volume = 1, year = 2018 }
%0 Journal Article %1 dankwa2018driving %A Dankwa, Nana Kesewaa %D 2018 %J Feminist Voices in Technology %N ISS001 %P 9-10 %T Driving smart home innovation with the gender dimension %U http://www.fvt-pp.uk/smartHomeGenderDimension.html %V 1
Draude, C., & Klumbyte, G. (2018). Acceptability by Design: Integrating Gender Research in HCI. In M. Koelle, H. Proﬁta, T. Olsson, R. Mitchell, J. Williamson, S. Kane, & S. Boll (Eds.), Proceedings of CHI’18 Workshop on (Un)Acceptable!?! – Re-thinking the Social Acceptability of Emerging Technologies. https://socialacceptabilityworkshop.uol.de/2018/proceedings/CHI18-SociallyAcceptableCHI-draude.pdf
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
@inproceedings{draude2018acceptability, author = {Draude, Claude and Klumbyte, Goda}, booktitle = {Proceedings of CHI’18 Workshop on (Un)Acceptable!?! – Re-thinking the Social Acceptability of Emerging Technologies}, editor = {Koelle, Marion and Proﬁta, Halley and Olsson, Thomas and Mitchell, Robb and Williamson, Julie and Kane, Shaun and Boll, Susanne}, keywords = {myown}, title = {Acceptability by Design: Integrating Gender Research in HCI}, year = 2018 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 draude2018acceptability %A Draude, Claude %A Klumbyte, Goda %B Proceedings of CHI’18 Workshop on (Un)Acceptable!?! – Re-thinking the Social Acceptability of Emerging Technologies %D 2018 %E Koelle, Marion %E Proﬁta, Halley %E Olsson, Thomas %E Mitchell, Robb %E Williamson, Julie %E Kane, Shaun %E Boll, Susanne %T Acceptability by Design: Integrating Gender Research in HCI %U https://socialacceptabilityworkshop.uol.de/2018/proceedings/CHI18-SociallyAcceptableCHI-draude.pdf
Draude, C., Klumbyte, G., & Treusch, P. (2018). Re-Considering Bias: What Could Bringing Gender Studies and Computing Together Teach Us About Bias in Information Systems?. In J. Bates, P. D. Clough, R. Jäschke, & J. Otterbacher (Eds.), Proceedings of International Workshop on Bias in Information, Algorithms, and Systems co-located with 13th International Conference on Transforming Digital Worlds (iConference 2018). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2103/
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
@inproceedings{draude2018reconsidering, author = {Draude, Claude and Klumbyte, Goda and Treusch, Pat}, booktitle = {Proceedings of International Workshop on Bias in Information, Algorithms, and Systems co-located with 13th International Conference on Transforming Digital Worlds (iConference 2018)}, editor = {Bates, Jo and Clough, Paul D. and Jäschke, Robert and Otterbacher, Jahna}, keywords = {myown}, publisher = {CEUR Workshop Proceedings}, title = {Re-Considering Bias: What Could Bringing Gender Studies and Computing Together Teach Us About Bias in Information Systems?}, year = 2018 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 draude2018reconsidering %A Draude, Claude %A Klumbyte, Goda %A Treusch, Pat %B Proceedings of International Workshop on Bias in Information, Algorithms, and Systems co-located with 13th International Conference on Transforming Digital Worlds (iConference 2018) %D 2018 %E Bates, Jo %E Clough, Paul D. %E Jäschke, Robert %E Otterbacher, Jahna %I CEUR Workshop Proceedings %T Re-Considering Bias: What Could Bringing Gender Studies and Computing Together Teach Us About Bias in Information Systems? %U http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2103/
Draude, C., & Maaß, S. (2018). Making IT Work: Integrating Gender Research in Computing Through a Process Model. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT, 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196839.3196846
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
To become effective in the field of computing, gender research must explain its concepts to non-gender studies scholars and to convince them of their relevance. Our title "Making IT Work" claims that both can be done: interlinking gender research and computing, and by that improving IT systems. We present the "Gender-Extended Research and Development" (GERD) model, a process model which combines gender and diversity aspects with all phases of computing research and development. The model with seven phases is a generalization of common process models in computing. Gender/diversity expertise has been condensed into a number of aspects that characterize the social context of computing research. They can be related to and reflected during every phase. This reflection is somewhat operationalized by providing a list of questions for each combination of phase and aspect. Case studies as part of the model illustrate either in what way such reflections may help in research and development or what may happen if no such aspects have been included.
@inproceedings{Draude:2018:MWI:3196839.3196846, abstract = {To become effective in the field of computing, gender research must explain its concepts to non-gender studies scholars and to convince them of their relevance. Our title "Making IT Work" claims that both can be done: interlinking gender research and computing, and by that improving IT systems. We present the "Gender-Extended Research and Development" (GERD) model, a process model which combines gender and diversity aspects with all phases of computing research and development. The model with seven phases is a generalization of common process models in computing. Gender/diversity expertise has been condensed into a number of aspects that characterize the social context of computing research. They can be related to and reflected during every phase. This reflection is somewhat operationalized by providing a list of questions for each combination of phase and aspect. Case studies as part of the model illustrate either in what way such reflections may help in research and development or what may happen if no such aspects have been included.}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, author = {Draude, Claude and Maaß, Susanne}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {43–50}, publisher = {ACM}, series = {GenderIT '18}, title = {Making IT Work: Integrating Gender Research in Computing Through a Process Model}, year = 2018 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 Draude:2018:MWI:3196839.3196846 %A Draude, Claude %A Maaß, Susanne %B Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT %C New York, NY, USA %D 2018 %I ACM %P 43--50 %R 10.1145/3196839.3196846 %T Making IT Work: Integrating Gender Research in Computing Through a Process Model %U http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3196839.3196846 %X To become effective in the field of computing, gender research must explain its concepts to non-gender studies scholars and to convince them of their relevance. Our title "Making IT Work" claims that both can be done: interlinking gender research and computing, and by that improving IT systems. We present the "Gender-Extended Research and Development" (GERD) model, a process model which combines gender and diversity aspects with all phases of computing research and development. The model with seven phases is a generalization of common process models in computing. Gender/diversity expertise has been condensed into a number of aspects that characterize the social context of computing research. They can be related to and reflected during every phase. This reflection is somewhat operationalized by providing a list of questions for each combination of phase and aspect. Case studies as part of the model illustrate either in what way such reflections may help in research and development or what may happen if no such aspects have been included. %@ 978-1-4503-5346-5
Klumbytė, G. (2018). Extended Cognition. In R. Braidotti & M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman Glossary (pp. 148-150). Bloomsbury Academic.
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
@incollection{klumbyte2018extended, address = {London}, author = {Klumbytė, Goda}, booktitle = {Posthuman Glossary}, editor = {Braidotti, Rosi and Hlavajova, Maria}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {148-150}, publisher = {Bloomsbury Academic}, title = {Extended Cognition}, year = 2018 }
%0 Book Section %1 klumbyte2018extended %A Klumbytė, Goda %B Posthuman Glossary %C London %D 2018 %E Braidotti, Rosi %E Hlavajova, Maria %I Bloomsbury Academic %P 148-150 %T Extended Cognition
Lücking, P., Lier, F., Bernotat, J., Wachsmuth, S., Ŝabanović, S., & Eyssel, F. (2018). Geographically Distributed Deployment of Reproducible HRI Experiments in an Interdisciplinary Research Context. Companion of the 2018 ACM IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 181-182. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3176963
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
Reproducible experiments are a major requirement for transparent, comparable and verifiable results in the field of human-robot interaction (HRI). Furthermore, a version-controlled and well-structured "ready to deploy" system setup of soft- and hard-ware for an HRI experiment opens up a range of innovative possibilities for interdisciplinary efforts as well as simplified participation of collaborators in the research community. However, making experiments reproducible is not a trivial task. It stems from the lack of agreed upon methodologies, tools and the inherent technical complexity. In this work we present our latest efforts in the context of an international and interdisciplinary research project to enable robotics researchers, software engineers, and social scientists to work together to reproduce a behavioral HRI experiment. The successful reproduction demonstrates that our tool chain approach meets the proposed requirements of the reproducibility problem. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time an integrated systemic approach allowed an identical instantiation of a complete HRI experiment at geographically distributed locations.
@inproceedings{Lucking:2018:GDD:3173386.3176963, abstract = {Reproducible experiments are a major requirement for transparent, comparable and verifiable results in the field of human-robot interaction (HRI). Furthermore, a version-controlled and well-structured "ready to deploy" system setup of soft- and hard-ware for an HRI experiment opens up a range of innovative possibilities for interdisciplinary efforts as well as simplified participation of collaborators in the research community. However, making experiments reproducible is not a trivial task. It stems from the lack of agreed upon methodologies, tools and the inherent technical complexity. In this work we present our latest efforts in the context of an international and interdisciplinary research project to enable robotics researchers, software engineers, and social scientists to work together to reproduce a behavioral HRI experiment. The successful reproduction demonstrates that our tool chain approach meets the proposed requirements of the reproducibility problem. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time an integrated systemic approach allowed an identical instantiation of a complete HRI experiment at geographically distributed locations.}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, author = {Lücking, Phillip and Lier, Florian and Bernotat, Jasmin and Wachsmuth, Sven and Ŝabanović, Selma and Eyssel, Friederike}, booktitle = {Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {181–182}, publisher = {ACM}, series = {HRI '18}, title = {Geographically Distributed Deployment of Reproducible HRI Experiments in an Interdisciplinary Research Context}, year = 2018 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 Lucking:2018:GDD:3173386.3176963 %A Lücking, Phillip %A Lier, Florian %A Bernotat, Jasmin %A Wachsmuth, Sven %A Ŝabanović, Selma %A Eyssel, Friederike %B Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction %C New York, NY, USA %D 2018 %I ACM %P 181--182 %R 10.1145/3173386.3176963 %T Geographically Distributed Deployment of Reproducible HRI Experiments in an Interdisciplinary Research Context %U http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3173386.3176963 %X Reproducible experiments are a major requirement for transparent, comparable and verifiable results in the field of human-robot interaction (HRI). Furthermore, a version-controlled and well-structured "ready to deploy" system setup of soft- and hard-ware for an HRI experiment opens up a range of innovative possibilities for interdisciplinary efforts as well as simplified participation of collaborators in the research community. However, making experiments reproducible is not a trivial task. It stems from the lack of agreed upon methodologies, tools and the inherent technical complexity. In this work we present our latest efforts in the context of an international and interdisciplinary research project to enable robotics researchers, software engineers, and social scientists to work together to reproduce a behavioral HRI experiment. The successful reproduction demonstrates that our tool chain approach meets the proposed requirements of the reproducibility problem. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time an integrated systemic approach allowed an identical instantiation of a complete HRI experiment at geographically distributed locations. %@ 978-1-4503-5615-2
Neumann, N., Meyer zu Borgsen, S., Lücking, P., & Wachsmuth, S. (2018). An automated pick-and-place benchmarking system in robotics. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions (ICARSC), 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICARSC.2018.8374190
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
The reproducibility and objective assessment of a robot's manipulation ability is a crucial topic in robotics. The definition of testing protocols and the automation of such test procedures is challenging. Most evaluation protocols in benchmarks and competitions include not completely standardized interactions of a human/referee and are furthermore influenced by partially subjective criteria across different research areas. A promising and more objective solution is to automate benchmarking protocols for a range of reproducible manipulation tasks. We present an approach that is simplified to the essential elements, in which most of the process and evaluation is automated. The proposed system has low price and effort requirements and allows researchers to compare their robots without placing them side by side. To allow a wide range of robots to be benchmarked all parts will be available open source. In our system, an object is positioned in front of the benchmarked robot by a mobile minirobot that localizes itself on a table according to the individual task's predefined positions. By automating most of the process we ensure that the object locations tested as well as the timings are reproducible and well documented. This approach fosters the objective comparability of robot performances.
@inproceedings{8374190, abstract = {The reproducibility and objective assessment of a robot's manipulation ability is a crucial topic in robotics. The definition of testing protocols and the automation of such test procedures is challenging. Most evaluation protocols in benchmarks and competitions include not completely standardized interactions of a human/referee and are furthermore influenced by partially subjective criteria across different research areas. A promising and more objective solution is to automate benchmarking protocols for a range of reproducible manipulation tasks. We present an approach that is simplified to the essential elements, in which most of the process and evaluation is automated. The proposed system has low price and effort requirements and allows researchers to compare their robots without placing them side by side. To allow a wide range of robots to be benchmarked all parts will be available open source. In our system, an object is positioned in front of the benchmarked robot by a mobile minirobot that localizes itself on a table according to the individual task's predefined positions. By automating most of the process we ensure that the object locations tested as well as the timings are reproducible and well documented. This approach fosters the objective comparability of robot performances.}, author = {{Neumann}, N. and {Meyer zu Borgsen}, S. and {Lücking}, P. and {Wachsmuth}, S.}, booktitle = {2018 IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions (ICARSC)}, keywords = {robotics}, month = {April}, pages = {243-249}, title = {An automated pick-and-place benchmarking system in robotics}, year = 2018 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 8374190 %A Neumann, N. %A Meyer zu Borgsen, S. %A Lücking, P. %A Wachsmuth, S. %B 2018 IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions (ICARSC) %D 2018 %P 243-249 %R 10.1109/ICARSC.2018.8374190 %T An automated pick-and-place benchmarking system in robotics %U https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8374190/ %X The reproducibility and objective assessment of a robot's manipulation ability is a crucial topic in robotics. The definition of testing protocols and the automation of such test procedures is challenging. Most evaluation protocols in benchmarks and competitions include not completely standardized interactions of a human/referee and are furthermore influenced by partially subjective criteria across different research areas. A promising and more objective solution is to automate benchmarking protocols for a range of reproducible manipulation tasks. We present an approach that is simplified to the essential elements, in which most of the process and evaluation is automated. The proposed system has low price and effort requirements and allows researchers to compare their robots without placing them side by side. To allow a wide range of robots to be benchmarked all parts will be available open source. In our system, an object is positioned in front of the benchmarked robot by a mobile minirobot that localizes itself on a table according to the individual task's predefined positions. By automating most of the process we ensure that the object locations tested as well as the timings are reproducible and well documented. This approach fosters the objective comparability of robot performances.

2017[ to top ]

Draude, C. (2017). Computing Bodies : Gender Codes and Anthropomorphic Design at the Human-Computer Interface. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden Imprint : Springer VS. http://www.worldcat.org/search?qt=worldcat_org_all&q=9783658186609
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
Claude Draude analyzes embodied software agents - interface solutions that are designed to talk back and give emotional feedback - from a gender and media studies perspective. She addresses technological and sociocultural concepts in their interplay of shifting the boundary between what is considered as human and what as machine. The author discusses the technological realization of specific personality models that define the design of embodied software agents - emotion and gaze models, in particular. Finally, she explores these models in their broader cultural context by relating them to the prominent topic of the Turing test and the notion of the Uncanny Valley. Contents The Human-Computer Interface Semiotic Mirrors: The Interface as a Place of Sign/Signal Mediating Embodiment: The Role of the Body, Gaze Behavior and Emotions Counting as Machine, Counting as Human Target Groups Researchers and students in the fields of media studies, computer science, cultural studies, gender studies, sociology The Author Prof. Dr. Claude Draude is head of the department for Gender/Diversity in Informatics Systems (GeDIS) at the Faculty of Electrical Engineering/Computing at the University of Kassel, Germany.
@book{draude2017computing, abstract = {Claude Draude analyzes embodied software agents - interface solutions that are designed to talk back and give emotional feedback - from a gender and media studies perspective. She addresses technological and sociocultural concepts in their interplay of shifting the boundary between what is considered as human and what as machine. The author discusses the technological realization of specific personality models that define the design of embodied software agents - emotion and gaze models, in particular. Finally, she explores these models in their broader cultural context by relating them to the prominent topic of the Turing test and the notion of the Uncanny Valley. Contents The Human-Computer Interface Semiotic Mirrors: The Interface as a Place of Sign/Signal Mediating Embodiment: The Role of the Body, Gaze Behavior and Emotions Counting as Machine, Counting as Human Target Groups Researchers and students in the fields of media studies, computer science, cultural studies, gender studies, sociology The Author Prof. Dr. Claude Draude is head of the department for Gender/Diversity in Informatics Systems (GeDIS) at the Faculty of Electrical Engineering/Computing at the University of Kassel, Germany.}, address = {Wiesbaden}, author = {Draude, Claude}, keywords = {software}, publisher = {Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden Imprint : Springer VS}, title = {Computing Bodies : Gender Codes and Anthropomorphic Design at the Human-Computer Interface}, year = 2017 }
%0 Book %1 draude2017computing %A Draude, Claude %C Wiesbaden %D 2017 %I Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden Imprint : Springer VS %T Computing Bodies : Gender Codes and Anthropomorphic Design at the Human-Computer Interface %U http://www.worldcat.org/search?qt=worldcat_org_all&q=9783658186609 %X Claude Draude analyzes embodied software agents - interface solutions that are designed to talk back and give emotional feedback - from a gender and media studies perspective. She addresses technological and sociocultural concepts in their interplay of shifting the boundary between what is considered as human and what as machine. The author discusses the technological realization of specific personality models that define the design of embodied software agents - emotion and gaze models, in particular. Finally, she explores these models in their broader cultural context by relating them to the prominent topic of the Turing test and the notion of the Uncanny Valley. Contents The Human-Computer Interface Semiotic Mirrors: The Interface as a Place of Sign/Signal Mediating Embodiment: The Role of the Body, Gaze Behavior and Emotions Counting as Machine, Counting as Human Target Groups Researchers and students in the fields of media studies, computer science, cultural studies, gender studies, sociology The Author Prof. Dr. Claude Draude is head of the department for Gender/Diversity in Informatics Systems (GeDIS) at the Faculty of Electrical Engineering/Computing at the University of Kassel, Germany. %@ 9783658186609 3658186607
Lier, F., Lücking, P., de Leeuw, J., Wachsmuth, S., Šabanović, S., & Goldstone, R. (2017). Can we Reproduce it? Toward the Implementation of good Experimental Methodology in Interdisciplinary Robotics Research. In F. P. Bonsignorio (Ed.), ICRA 2017 Workshop on Reproducible Research in Robotics: Current Status and Road Ahead. IEEE. https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2910475
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
The insufficient level of reproducibility of pub-lished experimental results has been identified as acore issuein the field of robotics in recent years. Why is that? First ofall, robotics focuses on the abstract concept of computationand thecreationof technological artifacts, i.e., software thatimplements these concepts. Hence, before actually reproducingan experiment, the subject of investigation must beartificiallycreated, which is non-trivial given the inherent complexity [5].Second, robotics experiments usually include expensive andoften customized hardware setups (robots), that are difficultto operate for non-experts. Finally, there is no agreed uponset of methods in order to setup, execute, or (re-)conduct anexperiment.To this end, we introduce an interdisciplinary and geograph-ically distributed collaboration project that aims at implement-ing good experimental methodology in interdisciplinary roboticsresearch with respect to: a) reproducibility of required technicalartifacts, b) explicit and comprehensible experiment design, c)repeatable/reproducible experiment execution, and d) repro-ducible evaluation of obtained experiment data. The ultimategoal of this collaboration is to reproduce thesameexperiment intwo different laboratories using the same systematic approachwhich is presented in this work.
@inproceedings{lier2017reproduce, abstract = {The insufficient level of reproducibility of pub-lished experimental results has been identified as acore issuein the field of robotics in recent years. Why is that? First ofall, robotics focuses on the abstract concept of computationand thecreationof technological artifacts, i.e., software thatimplements these concepts. Hence, before actually reproducingan experiment, the subject of investigation must beartificiallycreated, which is non-trivial given the inherent complexity [5].Second, robotics experiments usually include expensive andoften customized hardware setups (robots), that are difficultto operate for non-experts. Finally, there is no agreed uponset of methods in order to setup, execute, or (re-)conduct anexperiment.To this end, we introduce an interdisciplinary and geograph-ically distributed collaboration project that aims at implement-ing good experimental methodology in interdisciplinary roboticsresearch with respect to: a) reproducibility of required technicalartifacts, b) explicit and comprehensible experiment design, c)repeatable/reproducible experiment execution, and d) repro-ducible evaluation of obtained experiment data. The ultimategoal of this collaboration is to reproduce thesameexperiment intwo different laboratories using the same systematic approachwhich is presented in this work.}, author = {Lier, Florian and Lücking, Phillip and de Leeuw, Joshua and Wachsmuth, Sven and Šabanović, Selma and Goldstone, Robert}, booktitle = {ICRA 2017 Workshop on Reproducible Research in Robotics: Current Status and Road Ahead}, editor = {Bonsignorio, Fabio P.}, keywords = {itegpub}, publisher = {IEEE}, title = {Can we Reproduce it? Toward the Implementation of good Experimental Methodology in Interdisciplinary Robotics Research}, year = 2017 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 lier2017reproduce %A Lier, Florian %A Lücking, Phillip %A de Leeuw, Joshua %A Wachsmuth, Sven %A Šabanović, Selma %A Goldstone, Robert %B ICRA 2017 Workshop on Reproducible Research in Robotics: Current Status and Road Ahead %D 2017 %E Bonsignorio, Fabio P. %I IEEE %T Can we Reproduce it? Toward the Implementation of good Experimental Methodology in Interdisciplinary Robotics Research %U https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2910475 %X The insufficient level of reproducibility of pub-lished experimental results has been identified as acore issuein the field of robotics in recent years. Why is that? First ofall, robotics focuses on the abstract concept of computationand thecreationof technological artifacts, i.e., software thatimplements these concepts. Hence, before actually reproducingan experiment, the subject of investigation must beartificiallycreated, which is non-trivial given the inherent complexity [5].Second, robotics experiments usually include expensive andoften customized hardware setups (robots), that are difficultto operate for non-experts. Finally, there is no agreed uponset of methods in order to setup, execute, or (re-)conduct anexperiment.To this end, we introduce an interdisciplinary and geograph-ically distributed collaboration project that aims at implement-ing good experimental methodology in interdisciplinary roboticsresearch with respect to: a) reproducibility of required technicalartifacts, b) explicit and comprehensible experiment design, c)repeatable/reproducible experiment execution, and d) repro-ducible evaluation of obtained experiment data. The ultimategoal of this collaboration is to reproduce thesameexperiment intwo different laboratories using the same systematic approachwhich is presented in this work.

2016[ to top ]

Lücking, P., Rohlfing, K. J., Wrede, B., & Schilling, M. (2016). Preschoolers’ engagement in social interaction with an autonomous robotic system. 2016 Joint IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob), 210-216. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEVLRN.2016.7846821
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
- [ DOI ]
In this paper, we present an empirical study with children at the age of 4 and 5 years to reveal whether they engage with a robot in an interaction. For our analysis, we developed a score assessing the interaction level. It consists of emotional involvement, engagement and independence of the child in the interaction. For the interaction, an autonomous system was equipped with a designed dialogic structure. It consisted of a repertoire of (pre-recorded) interaction protocols that a robot can apply in an interaction. The results from the evaluation suggest that the implementation was successful as most of the studied children engaged in the interaction with the robot. The results also reveal some gender differences. The long-term aim of the study is to develop an autonomous system that can be applied in an interaction with young children.
@inproceedings{7846821, abstract = {In this paper, we present an empirical study with children at the age of 4 and 5 years to reveal whether they engage with a robot in an interaction. For our analysis, we developed a score assessing the interaction level. It consists of emotional involvement, engagement and independence of the child in the interaction. For the interaction, an autonomous system was equipped with a designed dialogic structure. It consisted of a repertoire of (pre-recorded) interaction protocols that a robot can apply in an interaction. The results from the evaluation suggest that the implementation was successful as most of the studied children engaged in the interaction with the robot. The results also reveal some gender differences. The long-term aim of the study is to develop an autonomous system that can be applied in an interaction with young children.}, author = {Lücking, Phillip and Rohlfing, Katharina J. and Wrede, Britta and Schilling, Malte}, booktitle = {2016 Joint IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob)}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {210-216}, publisher = {IEEE}, title = {Preschoolers' engagement in social interaction with an autonomous robotic system}, year = 2016 }
%0 Conference Paper %1 7846821 %A Lücking, Phillip %A Rohlfing, Katharina J. %A Wrede, Britta %A Schilling, Malte %B 2016 Joint IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob) %D 2016 %I IEEE %P 210-216 %R 10.1109/DEVLRN.2016.7846821 %T Preschoolers' engagement in social interaction with an autonomous robotic system %U https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7846821 %X In this paper, we present an empirical study with children at the age of 4 and 5 years to reveal whether they engage with a robot in an interaction. For our analysis, we developed a score assessing the interaction level. It consists of emotional involvement, engagement and independence of the child in the interaction. For the interaction, an autonomous system was equipped with a designed dialogic structure. It consisted of a repertoire of (pre-recorded) interaction protocols that a robot can apply in an interaction. The results from the evaluation suggest that the implementation was successful as most of the studied children engaged in the interaction with the robot. The results also reveal some gender differences. The long-term aim of the study is to develop an autonomous system that can be applied in an interaction with young children.