Evaluation results WS 23/24

The content on this page was translated automatically.

Type of event Seminar

Scale 1-5 (1= "strongly agree" to 5= "strongly disagree"); mw= mean value; md=median; number of questionnaires
Overview of participants:   n=1025
Type of last degree::    
Fachabitur   3.2%
Abitur   75.9%
Study   15.2%
Vocational training   5.7%
Current semester:    
1-2   12,2%
3-4   25,8%
5-6   24,4%
7-8   16,7%
>8   20,9%
How many events were attended on average?    
1-3   8,5%
4-7   51,2%
8-11   30,8%
11-14   8%
>14   1,5%
Intended degree:    
L1   27,3%
L2   9,1%
L3   36%
L4   4,6%
BA   14.1%
MA   7.1%
     
Agreement with statements about the respective events: mean median
Scale 1-5 (1= "strongly agree" to 5= "strongly disagree") mw md
The course also encourages me to think about the content beyond the course itself 2.0 2
I read the specified required literature 2,1 2
I read additional recommended texts or research aspects mentioned by the lecturer in the course 3,5 4
I participate in the course by asking questions and contributing to the discussion 2,4 2
The participating students actively contribute to the success of this course by asking questions and making their own contributions 1,9 2
The course has a comprehensible content structure 1,6 1
The course helps me to take a differentiated look at technical aspects or contexts and to discuss them 1,8 2
The course opens up new perspectives for me 1,8 2
I can follow the pace of the course well 1.5 1
The course content is conveyed in an understandable way 1.6 1
The lecturer responds to students' questions and suggestions 1,3 1
The lecturer values the cooperation of the students 1,4 1
The lecturer treats students with respect 1,2 1
The lecturer shows enthusiasm for his/her subject area 1,3 1
The lecturer manages the course well with regard to the following aspects:    
a) the timing of the semester 1.5 1
b) Timing of the session 1,6 1
c) content organization 1.5 1
d) communicative organization 1.5 1
e) Methodological design 1.8 2
My learning process is supported by...    
a) the materials selected for the course 1,8 2
b) the preparation of the course content 1,9 2
What applies to this course in particular (multiple answers possible)?    
Interdisciplinarity   28.1%
Relevance to current research   41.5%
Teaching the basics   57.9%
Project orientation   18.9%
Linking theory and practice   56.1%
Teaching methods of scientific work   23.8%
I am attending the course    
because I have to cover a sub-module   80.7%
because of my fellow students   9.2%
because it prepares me for my final exam   9.3%
because of the date   31.1%
because I am interested in the topic   61.6%
because of the lecturer   38.9%
because the content taught is important for my future career   29.1%
I feel that the amount of work expected of me for this course is    
too low   3.5%
appropriate   88.8%
too high   7.6%
On average, I spend    
0-1 hours   26.6%
1-2 hours   46.2%
2-4 hours   21.5%
4-6 hours   4%
>6 hours   1.7%
I was absent for at least a third of the time for the following reasons    
employment   27.6%
Family commitments   23.6%
lack of interest   4%
Illness   20.7%
mobility problems   20.2%
Overwork   18.3%
Competing leisure program   5.6%
Other   12.7%

Type of event Lecture

Overview of participants:   n=455
Degree aspired to:    
Bachelor major   6.8%
Bachelor minor   2.6%
Master   7.1%
Teaching degree for primary schools   50.6%
Teaching degree for lower and intermediate secondary schools   5.1%
Teaching degree at grammar schools   23.8%
L4 second subject (BA or MA)   2.2%
Current semester:    
1-2   72,5%
3-4   16,1%
5-11   10,2%
12 and more   1.1%
Gender:    
female   79.2%
male   15.2%
diverse   0.9%
not specified   4.6%
     
Agreement with statements about the respective events: mean median
Scale 1-5 (1= "strongly agree" to 5= "strongly disagree") mw md
The course follows a clear structure. 1.5 1
The objectives of the course are comprehensible. 1.7 1
The teacher manages the time available well. 1.7 1
The course encourages in-depth discussion of the content covered. 2,1 2
The teacher explains in an understandable way. 1,7 1
The visualizations and examples used support the understanding of the content covered. 1,7 1
The teacher makes clear connections between the content covered in this course and other course content. 2,1 2
The course gives an insight into the practical relevance of the content covered. 2 2
I can participate sufficiently in the content of this course. 2,1 2
The teacher is sufficiently available to answer questions. 1,6 1
The teacher behaves fairly and respectfully towards all students 1,4 1
The media used (e.g. slides, videos, blackboard pictures) help students to understand the content covered. 1,7 1
The teaching materials (e.g. slides, bibliography, script) are provided in a structured manner1.5 1  
Scale 1-5 (1= "too high" to 5= "too low")    
The level of difficulty in this course is ... 2.8 3
The pace of this course is... 2.8 3
The amount of work required for this course so far has been... 2.7 3
Overall assessment:    
Scale 1-5 (1= "very good" to 5= "very bad") 1.8 2