CritML Work­shop at CHI­ta­ly 2021

Cri­ti­cal Tools for Ma­chi­ne Learning: Fi­gu­ring, fa­bu­la­ting, si­tua­ting, dif­frac­ting ma­chi­ne learning sys­tems de­sign

This workshop draws on feminist and critical methodologies to construct interdisciplinary interventions in the design of machine learning systems, towards more inclusive, reflective and contextualized systems design. Tapping into feminist technoscience research, the project takes up concepts of “figuration”, “situating/situated knowledge”, “critical fabulation/speculation” and “diffraction” as theoretical tools that can help re-imagine machine learning systems design as a more contextualized, transdisciplinary process.

The purpose of the workshop is to experiment with how machine learning systems can be imagined and designed in a more situated, inclusive, contextualized and accountable way in order to reduce the systemic socio-cultural biases and develop more socially responsible frameworks of design. The premise of the work is that while computer science has developed sophisticated technical tools to improve machine learning accuracy and expand application fields, it is facing issues in particular with regards to systemic socio-cultural bias. Critical theories, particularly feminist and postcolonial critical theories, have developed tools to address societal bias and its embeddedness in systems of thought and technology, and to trace how these embeddings give rise to new and reproduce existing hierarchies of power in society.

This workshop thus aims to translate insights developed by those critical study fields into approaches in machine learning systems design through an experimental workshop. Concretely, the objectives of this workshops are: 1) to introduce critical methodologies as potential design intervention tools; 2) to generate creative ways to translate such methodologies into approaches to and tools for machine learning systems design.

The workshop will be divided into four main parts:

  1. critical concepts from feminist technoscience as well as the standard machine learning systems design chain will be introduced and discussed.
  2. Participants in smaller groups will chose one methodological concept to work with and will discuss concrete ways how this concept can be applied in machine learning systems design, relying on intervening into the more conventional machine learning systems design process flowchart as a basis for intervention.
  3. Participants will apply their critical concept as a methodological tool in a speculative machine learning systems design scenario.
  4. The results will be discussed collectively.

Workshop process will be documented on our research blog 'Engines of Difference' for critical computing.

Con­fe­rence De­tails

CHItaly 2021 - Frontiers of HCI
July 11-13, 2021
Bozen-Bolzano (Italy) and online (www)

Conference Details: More Infos

Or­ga­nisers and Con­tact

Goda Klumbytė, research associate and PhD candidate at the Gender/Diversity in Informatics Systems group, University of Kassel, Germany. Her research engages feminist theory, science and technology studies and critical computing, including human-computer interaction, with focus on knowledge production in and through machine learning systems and critical epistemologies as tools for intervention.

Claude Draude, Professor at the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Kassel, Germany. She is head of the work group Gender/Diversity in Informatics Systems (GeDIS) and on the director’s board of the Research Center for Information System Design (ITeG). Draude’s research activities evolve around sociotechnical systems and human-computer interaction. She mainly works on participatory, critical and use-oriented design; human models, embodiment and artificial intelligence; artistic research and the knowledge question in computing.

Alex Taylor, Reader in Human- Computer Interaction and Co-Director of the Centre for Human Computer Interaction Design, City, University of London, UK. His research ranges from empirical studies of technology in everyday life to speculative design interventions—both large and small scale. Across these realms, he draws on a feminist technoscience to ask questions about the co-constitutive roles human-machine composites play in forms of knowing and being, and how they might open up possibilities for fundamental transformations in society.

If you have any questions, please contact